Long-term Changes in Personal Recovery and Quality of Life Among Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Different Durations of Illness: A Meta-analysis

Author:

de Winter Lars12,Jelsma Auke2,Vermeulen Jentien M2,van Weeghel Jaap3,Hasson-Ohayon Ilanit4,Mulder Cornelis L56,Boonstra Nynke78,Veling Wim9,de Haan Lieuwe2

Affiliation:

1. Phrenos Center of Expertise , Utrecht , the Netherlands

2. Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location AMC , Amsterdam , the Netherlands

3. Tranzo, Tilburg University , Tilburg , the Netherlands

4. Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat-Gan , Israel

5. Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Erasmus Medical Center,  Rotterdam , the Netherlands

6. Parnassia Psychiatric Institute , Rotterdam , the Netherlands

7. NHL Stenden University of Applied Science , Leeuwarden , the Netherlands

8. University Medical Center Utrecht , Division Neuroscience, Utrecht , the Netherlands

9. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background and Hypothesis In schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) personal recovery and subjective quality of life (S-QOL) are crucial and show conceptual overlap. There is limited knowledge about how these outcomes change over time. Therefore, we investigated changes in personal recovery or S-QOL for patients with SSD. We specifically focused on the influence of the patients’ durations of illness (DOI) on changes in personal recovery and S-QOL. Study Design We included 46 studies investigating longitudinal changes in quantitative assessments of personal recovery or S-QOL for patients with SSD. Outcomes were categorized in overall personal recovery, overall S-QOL connectedness, hope and optimism, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment. We evaluated effect sizes of change between baseline and follow-up assessments. We also evaluated potential moderating effects, including DOI on these changes in outcomes. Study Results We found small improvements of overall personal recovery and S-QOL, but marginal or no improvement over time in the other more specific outcome domains. Patients without a schizophrenia diagnosis, a younger age, and more recent publications positively influenced these changes. We found no significant influence of DOI on the changes in any outcome domain. Conclusions Improvement in personal recovery or S-QOL of people with SSD is modest at best. However, these studies did not fully capture the personal narratives or nonlinear process of recovery of an individual. Future research should focus on how to shift from a clinical to more person-oriented approach in clinical practice to support patients in improving their personal process of recovery. Review protocol registration CRD42022377100.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3