Success rate of acquiring informed consent and barriers to participation in a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for non-curative stage IV colon cancer in Japan (JCOG1107)

Author:

Akagi Tomonori1ORCID,Suzuki Kosuke1,Kono Yohei1,Ninomiya Shigeo1,Shibata Tomotaka1,Ueda Yoshitake1,Shiroshita Hidefumi1,Etoh Tsuyoshi1,Shiomi Akio2,Ito Masaaki3,Watanabe Jun45,Murata Kohei6,Hirano Yasumitsu7,Shimomura Manabu8,Tsukamoto Shunsuke9,Kanemitsu Yukihide9,Inomata Masafumi1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine , Oita , Japan

2. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital , Shizuoka , Japan

3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East , Chiba , Japan

4. Department of Surgery , Gastroenterological Center, , Kanagawa , Japan

5. Yokohama City University Medical Center , Gastroenterological Center, , Kanagawa , Japan

6. Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital , Hyogo , Japan

7. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center , Saitama , Japan

8. Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital , Hiroshima , Japan

9. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background Successful achievement of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is dependent on the acquisition of informed consent (IC) from patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively calculate the proportion of participation in a surgical RCT and to identify the reasons for failed acquisition of IC. Methods A 50-insitution RCT was conducted to evaluate oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for stage IV colon cancer (JCOG1107: UMIN-CTR 000000105). The success rate of obtaining IC was evaluated in eight periods between January 2013 and January 2021. In addition, reasons for failed acquisition of IC were identified from questionnaires. Results In total, 391 patients were informed of their eligibility for the trial, and 168 (42%) were randomly assigned to either the laparoscopic surgery group (n = 84) or open surgery group (n = 84). The success rate of IC acquisition ranged from 33 to 58% in three periods. The most common reasons for failed IC acquisition were the patients’ preference for one approach of surgery based on recommendations from referring doctors and family members, and anxiety/unhappiness about randomization. Conclusions The success rate of acquiring IC from patients for an RCT of laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage IV colon cancer was lower than the expected rate planned in the protocol. To obtain the planned rate, investigators should make efforts to inform patients and their families about the medical contributions a surgical RCT can make and recognize that the period in equipoise may be limited.

Funder

National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund

Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for Clinical Cancer Research

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Comparability of entry characteristics and survival in randomized patients and nonrandomized patients meeting randomization criteria;Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery;J Am Coll Cardiol,1984

2. Recruitment of patients with lung cancer into a randomised clinical trial: experience at two centres. On behalf of the big lung trial steering committee;Spiro;Thorax,2000

3. Recruitment and retention challenges in breast cancer survivorship research: results from a multisite, randomized intervention trial in women with early stage breast cancer;Sears;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2003

4. Non-entry of eligible patients into the Australasian laparoscopic colon cancer study;Abraham;ANZ J Surg,2006

5. Patient entry into randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer treatment: factors influencing participation;Solomon;Surgery,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3