Importance of diagnostic setting in determining mortality in patients with new-onset heart failure: temporal trends in Denmark from 1997 to 2017

Author:

Arulmurugananthavadivel Anojhaan1ORCID,Holt Anders1ORCID,Parveen Saaima1ORCID,Lamberts Morten1,Gislason Gunnar H12ORCID,Torp-Pedersen Christian345,Madelaire Christian1ORCID,Andersson Charlotte16ORCID,Zahir Deewa1,Butt Jawad H7ORCID,Petrie Mark C89ORCID,McMurray John9ORCID,Fosbol Emil L7ORCID,Kober Lars7ORCID,Schou Morten1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, 2900 Copenhagen, Denmark

2. The Danish Heart Foundation, 1120 Copenhagen, Denmark

3. Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9100 Aalborg

4. Department of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark

5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark

6. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, 02118 Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

8. Department of Cardiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, G4 0SF Glasgow, UK

9. British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, G12 8TA Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Abstract Aim To investigate temporal trends in inpatient vs. outpatient diagnosis of new-onset heart failure (HF) and the subsequent risk of death and hospitalization. Methods and results Using nationwide registers, 192 581 patients with a first diagnosis of HF (1997–2017) were included. We computed incidences of HF, age-standardized mortality rates, and absolute risks (ARs) of death and hospitalization (accounting for competing risk of death) to understand the importance of the diagnosis setting in relation to subsequent mortality and hospitalization. The overall incidence of HF was approximately the same (170/100 000 persons) every year during 1997–2017. However, in 1997, 77% of all first diagnoses of HF were made during a hospitalization, whereas the proportion was 39% in 2017. As inpatient diagnoses decreased, outpatient diagnoses increased from 23% to 61%. Outpatients had lower mortality and hospitalization rates than inpatients throughout the study period, although the 1-year age-standardized mortality rate decreased for each inpatient (24 to 14/100-person) and outpatient (11 to 7/100-person). One-year and five-year AR of death decreased by 11.1% and 17.0%, respectively, for all HF patients, while the risk of hospitalization for HF did not decrease significantly (1.13% and 0.96%, respectively). Conclusion Between 1997 and 2017, HF changed from being primarily diagnosed during hospitalization to being mostly diagnosed in the outpatient setting. Outpatients had much lower mortality rates than inpatients throughout the study period. Despite a significant decrease in mortality risk for all HF patients, neither inpatients nor outpatients experienced a reduction in the risk of an HF hospitalization.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Health Policy

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3