Biology and Clinical Implications of Fecal Occult Blood Test Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer

Author:

Mendis Shehara12ORCID,Hong Wei13,Ananda Sumitra124,Faragher Ian5ORCID,Jones Ian67,Croxford Matthew5,Steel Malcolm8,Jalali Azim12,Gard Grace12,To Yat Hang13ORCID,Lee Margaret12910,Kosmider Suzanne2ORCID,Wong Rachel1910ORCID,Tie Jeanne123ORCID,Gibbs Peter12311

Affiliation:

1. Personalised Oncology Division, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia

2. Department of Medical Oncology, Sunshine Hospital, Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia

5. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Footscray Hospital, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia

6. Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia

7. Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

8. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia

9. Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia

10. Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia

11. Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Fecal occult blood test (FOBT)–based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces mortality, with earlier stage at diagnosis a prominent feature. Other characteristics of FOBT screen-detected cancers and any implications for clinical management have not been well explored. Methods We examined a multisite clinical registry to compare the characteristics and outcomes of FOBT screen-detected CRC via the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), which is offered biennially to individuals aged 50-74 years, and age-matched non-screen-detected CRC in the same registry. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the Baptista-Pike method, and hazard ratios via the log-rank method. Results Of 7153 registry patients diagnosed June 1, 2006, to June 30, 2020, 4142 (57.9%) were aged between 50 and 74 years. Excluding 406 patients with non-NBCSP screen-detected cancers and 35 patients with unknown method of detection, 473 (12.8%) were screen detected via the NBCSP, and 3228 (87.2%) were non-screen detected. Screen-detected patients were younger (mean age = 62.4 vs 64.2 years; P < .001) and more medically fit (OR for ASA score 1-2 = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51 to 2.41; P < .001). Pathologic characteristics within each stage favored the screen-detected patients. Stage III screen-detected colon cancers were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy (OR = 3.58, 95% CI = 1.52 to 8.36; P = .002). Screen-detected patients had superior relapse-free (hazard ratio = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.60; P < .001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.35; P < .001), which was maintained in matched stage comparisons and multivariable analysis. Conclusions Beyond stage at diagnosis, multiple other factors associated with a favorable outcome are observed in FOBT screen-detected CRC. Given the substantial stage-by-stage differences in survival outcomes, if independently confirmed, individualized adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies could be warranted for FOBT screen-detected cancers.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3