Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data

Author:

Reed Kristine G12,Sun Zhaojun3,Yabes Jonathan G45ORCID,Drake Coleman3ORCID,Ober Nicole3,Jacobs Bruce6ORCID,van Londen G J2ORCID,Bradley Cathy J78ORCID,Sabik Lindsay M3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, USA

2. Shenandoah Oncology , Winchester, VA, USA

3. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, USA

4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, USA

5. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, USA

6. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, PA, USA

7. University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center , Aurora, CO, USA

8. Department of Health Systems, Management & Policy, Colorado School of Public Health , Aurora, CO, USA

Abstract

Abstract Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation certifies facilities provide quality care. We assessed differences among patients who do and do not visit CoC facilities using Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data linked to facility records for patients diagnosed with cancer between 2018 and 2019 (n = 87 472). Predicted probabilities from multivariable logistic regression indicated patients in the most advantaged Area Deprivation Index quartiles were more likely to visit CoC facilities (78.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.5% to 78.6%) compared with other quartiles. Urban patients (74.1%, 95% CI = 73.8% to 74.4%) were more likely than rural to be seen at a CoC facility (62.7%, 95% CI = 61.2% to 64.2%) as were Hispanic patients (88.0%, 95% CI = 86.7% to 89.3%) and non-Hispanic Black patients (79.1%, 95% CI = 78.1% to 80.0%) compared with White patients (72.0%, 95% CI = 71.7% to 72.4%). Differences in demographics suggest CoC data may underrepresent some groups, including low-income and rural patients.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3