Neural Correlates of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in Schizotypy and Recent Onset Psychosis: A Multivariate Pattern Classification Approach

Author:

Schröder Rebekka1,Faiola Eliana1,Fernanda Urquijo Maria2,Bey Katharina3,Meyhöfer Inga1,Steffens Maria1,Kasparbauer Anna-Maria1,Ruef Anne2,Högenauer Hanna3,Hurlemann René45,Kambeitz Joseph6ORCID,Philipsen Alexandra3,Wagner Michael3,Koutsouleris Nikolaos2,Ettinger Ulrich1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Bonn , Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn , Germany

2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich , Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, Munich , Germany

3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn , Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn , Germany

4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oldenburg Medical Campus , Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 7, 26160, Bad Zwischenahn , Germany

5. Department of Psychiatry and Division of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn , Germany

6. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne , Kerpener Str. 62, 50931, Cologne , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Schizotypy refers to a set of personality traits that bear resemblance, at subclinical level, to psychosis. Despite evidence of similarity at multiple levels of analysis, direct comparisons of schizotypy and clinical psychotic disorders are rare. Therefore, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural correlates and task-based functional connectivity (psychophysiological interactions; PPI) of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) in patients with recent onset psychosis (ROP; n = 34), participants with high levels of negative (HNS; n = 46) or positive (HPS; n = 41) schizotypal traits, and low-schizotypy control participants (LS; n = 61) using machine-learning. Despite strong previous evidence that SPEM is a highly reliable marker of psychosis, patients and controls could not be significantly distinguished based on SPEM performance or blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal during SPEM. Classification was, however, significant for the right frontal eye field (FEF) seed region in the PPI analyses but not for seed regions in other key areas of the SPEM network. Applying the right FEF classifier to the schizotypal samples yielded decision scores between the LS and ROP groups, suggesting similarities and dissimilarities of the HNS and HPS samples with the LS and ROP groups. The very small difference between groups is inconsistent with previous studies that showed significant differences between patients with ROP and controls in both SPEM performance and underlying neural mechanisms with large effect sizes. As the current study had sufficient power to detect such differences, other reasons are discussed.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3