The effectiveness of interventions in reducing pain related to orthodontic separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Al-Hanbali Lama Mohammad Saffouh1,Burhan Ahmad Sharafeddin1ORCID,Hajeer Mohammad Younis1ORCID,Sultan Kinda1,Nawaya Fehmieh Rafik2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus , Damascus, DAM72 H96 , Syria

2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Syrian Private University , Damascus Countryside, DCS19 DA12 , Syria

Abstract

Abstract Background Pain is an unpleasant experience and annoying sensation. To control this pain during orthodontic separation, different pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been used. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically assess the evidence of the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods in reducing pain induced by orthodontic separation. Search strategy An electronic search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed® (Medline), Scopus®, EMBASE®, Web of ScienceTM, Google ScholarTM, ProQuest, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) searching for the studies published between January 2012 and April 2023. Selection criteria Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, each experimental group included patients who received elastomeric separators and one kind of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for pain reduction during the separation stage. Data collection and analysis Cochrane’s risk of bias tool (RoB2 tool) was applied. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] approach was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. Results Thirty-one studies (RCTs) were included in this systematic review. Nineteen of them were appropriate for quantitative synthesis and used VAS for pain assessment. Meta-analysis showed that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was an effective approach for pain relief after separators placement with standard mean difference of 13.79 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): −15.64, −11.94) at 6 h and 23.34 mm at 24 h (95% CI: −25.91, −20.77). LLLT was also effective when applied in split-mouth and the standard mean difference was 8.9 mm at 6 h (95% CI: −12.86, −3.33) and 17.15 mm at 24 h (95% CI: −30.12, −4.17). Ibuprofen had a pain control effect at 6 h and at 24 h compared with the placebo group. The standard mean difference was 14.37 mm (95% CI: −20.54, −8.19) and 20.46 mm (95% CI: −27.79, −13.13), respectively. There was no difference in pain control between ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Naproxen had lower visual analog scale scores in pain perception at 6 h and the standard mean difference was 7.03 mm (95% CI: −12.67, −1.40). Conclusions The application of LLLT decreased the pain induced by the separation during the first day of teeth separation; the pain reduction showed an increase from 6 h to the end of the 24 h. However, the evidence is weak to moderate. The analgesics reduced the pain compared to placebo; this pain reduction had shown an increase from 6 h to the end of the 24 h. The strength of the evidence is moderate. Naproxen gel effectively reduced the pain compared to placebo; the evidence in this regard is moderate. Naproxen gel effectively reduced the pain compared to placebo, but it was less effective than the oral intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, the evidence in this regard is moderate. Registration This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335553) during the first stages of its conduction.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Orthodontics

Reference65 articles.

1. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment;Ngan,1989

2. Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances;Scheurer,1996

3. Psychological aspects of pain perception;McGrath,1994

4. Orthodontic pain: from causes to management—a review;Krishnan,2007

5. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment;Oliver;Br J Orthod,1985

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3