Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University 430079 , China
2. Department of Orthognathic & Cleft Lip and Palate Plastic Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University , Wuhan 430079 , China
3. Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong 999077 China
Abstract
Summary
Background
Agenesis of third molar agenesis has a higher incidence than other tooth development anomalies. Previous research identified a potential correlation between third molar agenesis and specific craniofacial morphology; however, no systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic currently exists.
Objective
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between third molar agenesis and craniofacial sagittal and vertical morphology.
Search methods
An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library without restrictions on publication year or language; this was supplemented by the manual retrieval of relevant literature.
Selection criteria
Cross-sectional studies that compared craniofacial morphology using angular and linear measurements obtained from lateral cephalography between patients with third molar agenesis and those without were included.
Data collection and analysis
The quality assessment of the enrolled articles was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed by Review Manager software (The Cochrane Collaborative, version 5.4, Cochrane IMS).
Results
A total of seven studies were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the ANB (mean differences (MD) = –0.75, 95% CI: –1.31 to –0.19, P < 0.01), palate length (ANS–PNS, MD = –1.68, 95% CI: –2.24 to –1.11, P < 0.01), and mandibular length (Go-Pog, MD = –0.36, 95% CI: –0.59 to –0.13, P < 0.01) were smaller in patients with third molar agenesis. With regard to vertical craniofacial morphology, the mandibular plane angle (MP-FH; MD = –1.88, 95% CI: –3.45 to –0.31, P = 0.02), gonial angle (gonial angle; MD = –1.73, 95% CI: –2.69 to –0.77, P < 0.01) and lower face height (lower face heigh angle; MD = –1.36, 95% CI: –1.94 to –0.77, P < 0.01) were smaller in patients with third molar agenesis, indicating a flatter or brachyfacial skeletal pattern.
Conclusions
The results of this study suggest that third molar agenesis maybe associated with a reduced maxillary length and a flatter mandible. However, these findings need to be interpreted with caution due to inconsistencies in the certainty of evidence.
Clinical Trial Registration
PROSPERO (CRD42023448226).
Funder
School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference54 articles.
1. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): a review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment;Rakhshan,2015
2. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients;Altug-Atac,2007
3. Meta-analysis of congenitally missing teeth in the permanent dentition: prevalence, variations across ethnicities, regions and time;Rakhshan,2015
4. PAX9 and MSX1 transcription factor genes in non-syndromic dental agenesis;Paixão-Côrtes,2011
5. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives;De Coster,2009