Normative Values for Pupillary Light Reflex Metrics Among Healthy Service Academy Cadets

Author:

Aderman Michael J1ORCID,Meister Melissa R2,Roach Megan H3,Dengler Bradley A2,Ross Jeremy D1,Malvasi Steven R1,Cameron Kenneth L1

Affiliation:

1. John A. Feagin Jr. Sports Medicine Fellowship Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keller Army Community Hospital , West Point, NY 10996-1197, USA

2. Division of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

3. DoD-VA Extremity Trauma & Amputation Center of Excellence, Womack Army Medical Center , Fort Bragg, NC 28310, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Assessments of the pupil’s response to light have long been an integral part of neurologic examinations. More recently, the pupillary light reflex (PLR) has shown promise as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury. However, to date, few large-scale normative data are available for comparison and reference, particularly, in military service members. The purpose of this study was to report normative values for eight PLR measurements among healthy service academy cadets based on sex, age, sleep, race, ethnicity, anisocoria, and concussion history. Methods Freshmen entering a U.S. Service Academy completed a quantitative pupillometric assessment in conjunction with baseline concussion testing. PLR measurements were conducted using a Neuroptics PLR-3000 with a 121 µW light stimulus. The device measured maximum and minimum pupil diameter (mm), latency (time to maximum pupil constriction post-light stimulus [s]), peak and average constriction velocity (mm/s), average dilation velocity (mm/s), percentage pupil constriction, and T75 (time for pupil re-dilation from minimum pupil diameter to 75% maximum diameter [s]). During baseline testing, cadets also reported concussion history (yes and no) and hours slept the night before (<5.5 and ≥5.5). Normative values for each PLR measurement were calculated as mean ± SD, percentiles, and interquartile range. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to assess differences based on sex, concussion history, ethnicity, and hours slept for each PLR measurement. Kruskall–Wallis testing was used to assess differences based on age, race, and anisocoria. Alpha was set at .05 and nonparametric effect sizes (r) were calculated for statistically significant results. Effect sizes were interpreted as no effect (r < .1), small (r ≥.1–<.3), medium (r ≥.3–<.5), or large (r ≥ .5). All procedures were reviewed and approved by the local institutional review board and the U.S. Army Human Research Protection Office before the study was conducted. Each subject provided informed consent to participate in the study before data collection. Results Of the 1,197 participants baselined, 514 cadets (131 female; 18.91 ± 0.96 years) consented and completed a valid baseline pupillometric assessment. Eighty participants reported at least one previous concussion and participants reported an average of 5.88 ± 1.63 h slept the previous night. Mann–Whitney U results suggest females had larger initial (z = −3.240; P = .001; r = .10) and end pupil diameter (z = −3.080; P = .002; r = .10), slower average dilation velocity (z = 3.254; P = .001; r = .11) and faster T75 values (z = −3.342; P = .001; r = .11). Age, sleep, and race stratified by sex, also displayed a significant impact on specific PLR metrics with effect sizes ranging from small to medium, while ethnicity, anisocoria, and concussion history did not display an impact on PLR metrics. Conclusion This study provides the largest population-specific normative values for eight PLR measurements. Initial and end pupil diameter, dilation velocity, and the T75 metrics differed by sex; however, these differences may not be clinically significant as small effect size was detected for all metrics. Sex, age, sleep, and race may impact specific PLR metrics and are worth consideration when performing PLR assessments for mild traumatic brain injury management.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3