Simple electrocardiographic measures improve sudden arrhythmic death prediction in coronary disease

Author:

Chatterjee Neal A12,Tikkanen Jani T23ORCID,Panicker Gopi K4ORCID,Narula Dhiraj5,Lee Daniel C6ORCID,Kentta Tuomas3,Junttila Juhani M3ORCID,Cook Nancy R2ORCID,Kadish Alan7,Goldberger Jeffrey J8,Huikuri Heikki V3,Albert Christine M29ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

2. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA

3. Department of Cardiology, Research Unit of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Oulu and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

4. Cardiac Safety Services, Quintiles, Mumbai, India

5. Mountainview Hospital, Las Vegas, NV, USA

6. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Touro College and University System, New York, NY, USA

8. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

9. Department of Cardiology, Smidt Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims To determine whether the combination of standard electrocardiographic (ECG) markers reflecting domains of arrhythmic risk improves sudden and/or arrhythmic death (SAD) risk stratification in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods and results The association between ECG markers and SAD was examined in a derivation cohort (PREDETERMINE; N = 5462) with adjustment for clinical risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and competing risk. Competing outcome models assessed the differential association of ECG markers with SAD and competing mortality. The predictive value of a derived ECG score was then validated (ARTEMIS; N = 1900). In the derivation cohort, the 5-year cumulative incidence of SAD was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–1.9] and 6.2% (95% CI 4.5–8.3) in those with a low- and high-risk ECG score, respectively (P for Δ < 0.001). A high-risk ECG score was more strongly associated with SAD than non-SAD mortality (adjusted hazard ratios = 2.87 vs. 1.38 respectively; P for Δ = 0.003) and the proportion of deaths due to SAD was greater in the high vs. low risk groups (24.9% vs. 16.5%, P for Δ = 0.03). Similar findings were observed in the validation cohort. The addition of ECG markers to a clinical risk factor model inclusive of LVEF improved indices of discrimination and reclassification in both derivation and validation cohorts, including correct reclassification of 28% of patients in the validation cohort [net reclassification improvement 28 (7–49%), P = 0.009]. Conclusion For patients with CHD, an externally validated ECG score enriched for both absolute and proportional SAD risk and significantly improved risk stratification compared to standard clinical risk factors including LVEF. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114269. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01114269.

Funder

The PRE-DETERMINE Study

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

St Jude Medical Inc.

St. Jude Medical Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3