To rarefy or not to rarefy: robustness and efficiency trade-offs of rarefying microbiome data

Author:

Hong Johnny1ORCID,Karaoz Ulas2ORCID,de Valpine Perry3,Fithian William1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

2. Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

3. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, UC Berkeley , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

Abstract

Abstract Motivation Microbiome datasets provide rich information about microbial communities. However, vast library size variations across samples present great challenges for proper statistical comparisons. To deal with these challenges, rarefaction is often used in practice as a normalization technique, although there has been debate whether rarefaction should ever be used. Conventional wisdom and previous work suggested that rarefaction should never be used in practice, arguing that rarefying microbiome data is statistically inadmissible. These discussions, however, have been confined to particular parametric models and simulation studies. Results We develop a semiparametric graphical model framework for grouped microbiome data and analyze in the context of differential abundance testing the statistical trade-offs of the rarefaction procedure, accounting for latent variations and measurement errors. Under the framework, it can be shown rarefaction guarantees that subsequent permutation tests properly control the Type I error. In addition, the loss in sensitivity from rarefaction is solely due to increased measurement error; if the underlying variation in microbial composition is large among samples, rarefaction might not hurt subsequent statistical inference much. We develop the rarefaction efficiency index (REI) as an indicator for efficiency loss and illustrate it with a dataset on the effect of storage conditions for microbiome data. Simulation studies based on real data demonstrate that the impact of rarefaction on sensitivity is negligible when overdispersion is prominent, while low REI corresponds to scenarios in which rarefying might substantially lower the statistical power. Whether to rarefy or not ultimately depends on assumptions of the data generating process and characteristics of the data. Availability and implementation Source codes are publicly available at https://github.com/jcyhong/rarefaction. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Funder

National Science Foundation through Research Training Groups

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Statistics and Probability

Reference43 articles.

1. A new method for non parametric multivariate analysis of variance;Anderson;Austral Ecol,2001

2. Species-level resolution of 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequenced through the MinIONTM portable nanopore sequencer;Benítez-Páez;Gigascience,2016

3. An ordination of upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin;Bray;Ecol. Monogr,1957

4. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis;Callahan;ISME J,2017

5. Variable selection for sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression with an application to microbiome data analysis;Chen;Ann. Appl. Stat,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3