Antimalarial primaquine for spinal sensory and motor blockade in rats

Author:

Chou An-Kuo12,Chiu Chong-Chi34,Wang Jhi-Joung56,Chen Yu-Wen57ORCID,Hung Ching-Hsia89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

2. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

3. Department of General Surgery, E-Da Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung,Taiwan

4. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung,Taiwan

5. Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan,Taiwan

6. Allied AI Biomed Center, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan,Taiwan

7. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Care, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

8. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

9. Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The purpose of the experiment was to estimate whether intrathecal antimalarial drugs could provoke spinal block, and their comparison with lidocaine. Methods Rats were intrathecally administrated with antimalarial agents (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) and lidocaine, and neurobehavioural examinations (nociception, proprioception and motor function) were assessed; n = 8 per group. One-way and two-way analysis of variance were designed to analyse data. Key findings At a concentration of 20 mM, primaquine (0.46 mg/rat) exhibited the longest duration and the most potent effect of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor blockade (P < 0.01) among five drugs, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency of spinal blockade compared with lidocaine (0.29 mg/rat). In dose-dependent studies, primaquine was more potent (P < 0.01) than lidocaine for spinal block. At ED25, ED50 and ED75 equipotent doses, primaquine produced a greater duration of spinal motor, proprioceptive and nociceptive blockade when compared with lidocaine (P < 0.01). Conclusions Primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine produced spinal blockade. Primaquine was more potent and displayed a prolonged life of local anaesthetic effect compared with lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency compared with lidocaine.

Funder

China Medical University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3