Novel equations for estimating intraperitoneal pressure among peritoneal dialysis patients

Author:

Li Xinqiu1234,Ma Tiantian1234,Hao Jiayu1234,Song Di1234,Wang Hongyan1234,Liu Tianjiao1234,Zhang Yaling1234,Abi Nanzha1234,Xu Xiao1234,Zhang Manze5,Sun Weiqi5,Li Xin5,Dong Jie1234

Affiliation:

1. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital , Beijing , China

2. Institute of Nephrology, Peking University , Beijing , China

3. Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health , Beijing , China

4. Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Education , Beijing , China

5. School of Basic Medical Sciences Peking University , China

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Increased intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) is associated with abdominal wall complications and technical failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Since the standard measurement of IPP is limited due to its cumbersome procedures, we aimed to develop and validate equations for estimating IPP. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study with a total of 200 prevalent PD patients who were divided into development and validation datasets after random sampling matched by body mass index. The IPPs were measured using the Durand method, with whole-body and abdominal anthropometry indices collected. Equations with 2.0-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were generated by stepwise linear regression modelling. The bias, accuracy and precision of the estimated IPP (eIPP) with 2-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were compared with actual IPPs by the Durand method. The eIPP for the 2-L fill volume was also compared with other existing equations. Results Two new equations incorporating waist circumference and height from the decubitus plane to mid-axillary line were generated. The eIPPs exhibited small biases in relation to the Durand method , with median differences of −0.24 cmH2O and −0.10 cmH2O for 2 L and 1.5 L, respectively. The precisions evaluated by the standard deviation of the absolute value of the differences were 2.59 cmH2O and 2.50 cmH2O, respectively. The accuracies evaluated by the value of the percentage of estimates that differed by >20% for the eIPP were 26% for 2.0 L and 27% for 1.5 L. Better bias, precision and accuracy were observed for the eIPP equation compared with other existing equations for the 2.0-L fill volume. Conclusions We provided two new equations developed from abdominal anthropometry indices to accurately estimate the IPP in the PD population.

Funder

Scientific Research Project of Capital Health Development

New Century Excellent Talents from Education Department of China

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3