A Cross-Sectional Study of Pain Sensitivity and Unpleasantness in People with Vascular Dementia

Author:

Beach Paul A12ORCID,Humbel Angela2,Dietrich Mary S3,Bruehl Stephen4,Cowan Ronald L5,Moss Karen O67,Monroe Todd B7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

2. Bachelors of Science in Nursing Program, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio

3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

5. Departments of Psychiatry and Anatomy and Neurobiology, Center for Addiction Science, College of Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee

6. Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio

7. Center for Healthy Aging, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Advanced age is associated with a higher risk of both pain and dementia, with many studies finding that dementia often heightens sensitivity to pain. Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common type of dementia. Only a few observational or retrospective studies have examined pain responsiveness in VaD, suggesting that it could increase pain unpleasantness (i.e., pain affect). This study compared thermal pain psychophysics between a cohort of patients with VaD and healthy control (HC) subjects. Design Single-center, cross-sectional, between-subjects design. Subjects Verbally communicative patients with probable VaD (n = 23) and age- and sex-matched HCs (n = 23). Methods A thermal psychophysics protocol assessed “mild pain” and “moderate pain” thresholds (temperature in degrees Celsius) and associated unpleasantness ratings (0–20 scale) in both the VaD and HC groups. Psychophysics were compared between groups by way of a mixed-effects analysis, controlling for depressive symptoms. Results There were no significant differences between groups for pain thresholds (main effect P = 0.086, Cohen’s d: mild = 0.55, moderate = 0.27). However, unpleasantness ratings were higher in the VaD group than in the HC group (main effect P = 0.003; mild pain P = 0.022, Cohen’s d = 0.79; moderate pain P = 0.057, Cohen’s d = 0.6). Conclusions These results are consistent with prior observational findings suggesting that VaD could make patients more susceptible to pain, particularly its affective component.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3