Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in relation to salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Author:

Martins Fernanda B1ORCID,Oliveira Millena B2ORCID,Oliveira Leandro M3ORCID,Lourenço Alan Grupioni4ORCID,Paranhos Luiz Renato5ORCID,Motta Ana Carolina F6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo , São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil

2. Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Uberlândia , Uberlândia, 38405-320, Brazil

3. Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria , Santa Maria, 97105-900, Brazil

4. Department of Basic and Oral Biology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto, 14040-904, Brazil

5. Department of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Uberlandia , Uberlandia, 38405-320, Brazil

6. Department of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto, 14040-904, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in relation to minor salivary gland biopsy (mSGB) in the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome (SS). Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Ten databases were searched to identify studies that compared the accuracy of SGUS and mSGB. The risk of bias was assessed, data were extracted, and univariate and bivariate random-effects meta-analyses were done. Results A total of 5000 records were identified; 13 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 10 in the quantitative synthesis. The first meta-analysis found a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92) for the predictive value of SGUS scoring in relation to the result of mSGB. In the second meta-analysis, mSGB showed higher sensitivity and specificity than SGUS. Sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85) for mSGB and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.81) for SGUS, and specificity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97) for mSGB and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) for SGUS. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of SGUS was similar to that of mSGB. SGUS is an effective diagnostic test that shows good sensitivity and high specificity, in addition to being a good tool for prognosis and for avoiding unnecessary biopsies. More studies using similar methodologies are needed to assess the accuracy of SGUS in predicting the result of mSGB. Our results will contribute to decision-making for the implementation of SGUS as a diagnostic tool for SS, considering the advantages of this method.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Dentistry,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3