Epidemiology and Outcomes of Antibiotic De-escalation in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals

Author:

Kam Kai Qian123ORCID,Chen Tom1,Kadri Sameer S45ORCID,Lawandi Alexander46ORCID,Yek Christina45ORCID,Walker Morgan45,Warner Sarah45,Fram David7,Chen Huai-Chun7,Shappell Claire N8ORCID,DelloStritto Laura1,Jin Robert1,Klompas Michael19ORCID,Rhee Chanu19ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute , Boston, Massachusetts ,

2. Infectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's & Children's Hospital , Singapore City ,

3. SingHealth Duke–NUS Pediatrics Academic Clinical Program, Duke–NUS Medical School , Singapore City ,

4. Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center , Bethesda, Maryland ,

5. Critical Care Medicine Branch, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute , Bethesda, Maryland ,

6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre , Montreal, Quebec ,

7. Commonwealth Informatics , Waltham, Massachusetts ,

8. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts ,

9. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts ,

Abstract

Abstract Background Little is known about the frequency, hospital-level variation, predictors, and outcomes of antibiotic de-escalation in suspected sepsis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed adults admitted to 236 US hospitals from 2017–2021 with suspected sepsis (defined by blood culture draw, lactate measurement, and intravenous antibiotic administration) who were initially treated with ≥2 days of anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics but had no resistant organisms that required these agents identified through hospital day 4. De-escalation was defined as stopping anti-MRSA and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics or switching to narrower antibiotics by day 4. We created a propensity score for de-escalation using 82 hospital and clinical variables; matched de-escalated to non–de-escalated patients; and assessed associations between de-escalation and outcomes. Results Among 124 577 patients, antibiotics were de-escalated in 36 806 (29.5%): narrowing in 27 177 (21.8%), cessation in 9629 (7.7%). De-escalation rates varied between hospitals (median, 29.4%; interquartile range, 21.3%–38.0%). Predictors of de-escalation included less severe disease on day 3–4, positive cultures for nonresistant organisms, and negative/absent MRSA nasal swabs. De-escalation was more common in medium, large, and teaching hospitals in the Northeast and Midwest. De-escalation was associated with lower adjusted risks for acute kidney injury (AKI) (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], .76–.84), intensive-care unit (ICU) admission after day 4 (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, .52–.66), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, .86–.996). Conclusions Antibiotic de-escalation in suspected sepsis is infrequent, variable across hospitals, linked with clinical and microbiologic factors, and associated with lower risk for AKI, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3