Patient- and family-centred care transition interventions for adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Author:

Chartrand Julie1ORCID,Shea Beverley234,Hutton Brian23,Dingwall Orvie56,Kakkar Anupriya6,Chartrand Mariève7,Poulin Ariane1,Backman Chantal138

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, University of Ottawa , 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada

2. School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa , 600 Peter Moran Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3, Canada

3. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada

4. Bruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care , 85 Primerose Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 6M1, Canada

5. Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba , 727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3P5, Canada

6. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa , 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Private, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada

7. Collège La Cité , 801 Aviation Parkway, Ottawa, Ontario K1K 4R3, Canada

8. Care of the Elderly, Bruyère Continuing Care , 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C8, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Although patient centredness is part of providing high-quality health care, little is known about the effectiveness of care transition interventions that involve patients and their families on readmissions to the hospital or emergency visits post-discharge. This systematic review (SR) aimed to examine the evidence on patient- and family-centred (PFC) care transition interventions and evaluate their effectiveness on adults’ hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits after discharge. Searches of Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases were conducted from the earliest available online year of indexing up to and including 14 March 2021. The studies included: (i) were about care transitions (hospital to home) of ≥18-year-old patients; (ii) had components of patient-centred care and care transition frameworks; (iii) reported on one or more outcomes were among hospital readmissions and ED visits after discharge; and (iv) were cluster-, pilot- or randomized-controlled trials published in English or French. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was performed, and pooled odd ratios, standardized mean differences, and mean differences were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Of the 10,021 citations screened, 50 trials were included in the SR and 44 were included in the meta-analyses. Care transition intervention types included health assessment, symptom and disease management, medication reconciliation, discharge planning, risk management, complication detection, and emotional support. Results showed that PFC care transition interventions significantly reduced the risk of hospital readmission rates compared to usual care [incident rate ratio (IRR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75–0.98; I2 = 73%] regardless of time elapsed since discharge. However, these same interventions had minimal impact on the risk of ED visit rates compared to usual care group regardless of time passed after discharge (IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85–1.18; I2 = 29%). PFC care transition interventions containing a greater number of patient-centred care (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.94; I2 = 59%) and care transition components (IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64–0.91; I2 = 4%) significantly decreased the risk of patients being readmitted. However, these interventions did not significantly increase the risk of patients visiting the ED after discharge (IRR, 1.54; CI 95%, 0.91–2.61). Future interventions should focus on patients’ and families’ values, beliefs, needs, preferences, race, age, gender, and social determinants of health to improve the quality of adults’ care transitions.

Funder

University of Ottawa

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3