Choice and Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery

Abstract

Abstract This chapter considers the role of choice as a normative transformer in relation to the practice of female genital cosmetic surgery. It is common, in law and practice, to distinguish between two sorts of female genital cutting. One is described as ‘female genital mutilation’ (FGM) and prohibited; the other is described as ‘female genital cosmetic surgery’ (FGCS) and permitted, even provided by the state in certain circumstances. The chapter argues that distinguishing between the two requires going beyond a simplistic contrast between choice and coercion. Both practices can be understood only within a cultural context that makes them available and marks them as appropriate. As with many other forms of cosmetic surgery, FGCS cannot be exonerated merely by an appeal to individual choice.