Impact of the extent of recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphadenectomy on thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world multicentre study

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine the impact of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node (LN) dissection on survival and postoperative complications in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS Patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 thoracic ESCC who underwent oesophagectomy and two-field lymphadenectomy from three institutions were included. The entire cohort was divided into three groups that underwent the total two-field lymphadenectomy (T-2FL), standard two-field lymphadenectomy (S-2FL) or unilateral RLN-LN dissection plus S-2FL (U-2FL) based on the extent of RLN-LN dissection. Subgroup analyses were also performed and were stratified by treatment modality. RESULTS Both the U-2FL and T-2FL groups had significantly superior outcomes compared with the S-2FL group (overall survival: U-2FL versus S-2FL: P = 0.002; T-2FL versus S-2FL: P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival: U-2FL versus S-2FL: P = 0.01; T-2FL versus S-2FL: P < 0.001). Moreover, no significant differences were observed between U-2FL and T-2FL regarding overall survival (P > 0.05) and recurrence-free survival (P > 0.05), irrespective of administration of neoadjuvant therapy plus oesophagectomy or upfront oesophagectomy. Additionally, the extent of RLN-LN dissection was not an independent predictor of stage migration (P = 0.14) but was for postoperative nodal upstaging (P = 0.02). Notably, S-2FL brought significantly lowered risk in postoperative complications, especially for RLN palsy, when compared with T-2FL (P = 0.002) but not U-2FL (P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS Adequacy of RLN-LN dissection is an important prognosticator for improved overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with thoracic ESCC. U-2FL may serve as an alternative to T-2FL in selected populations.