Biologic versus synthetic prosthesis for chest wall reconstruction: a matched analysis

Author:

Vanstraelen Stijn1,Bains Manjit S1,Dycoco Joe1,Adusumilli Prasad S1,Bott Matthew J1,Downey Robert J1,Huang James1,Isbell James M1ORCID,Molena Daniela1,Park Bernard J1,Rusch Valerie W1,Sihag Smita1,Allen Robert J2,Cordeiro Peter G2,Coriddi Michelle R2,Dayan Joseph H2,Disa Joseph J2,Matros Evan2,McCarthy Colleen M2,Nelson Jonas A2,Stern Carrie2,Shahzad Farooq2,Mehrara Babak2,Jones David R1,Rocco Gaetano1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA

2. Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between biologic and synthetic reconstructions after chest wall resection in a matched cohort. METHODS All patients who underwent reconstruction after full-thickness chest wall resection from 2000 to 2022 were reviewed and stratified by prosthesis type (biologic or synthetic). Biologic prostheses were of biologic origin or were fully absorbable and incorporable. Integer matching was performed to reduce confounding. The study end point was surgical site complications requiring reoperation. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify associated risk factors. RESULTS In total, 438 patients underwent prosthetic chest wall reconstruction (unmatched: biologic, n = 49; synthetic, n = 389; matched: biologic, n = 46; synthetic, n = 46). After matching, the median (interquartile range) defect size was 83 cm2 (50–142) for the biologic group and 90 cm2 (48–146) for the synthetic group (P = 0.97). Myocutaneous flaps were used in 33% of biologic reconstructions (n = 15) and 33% of synthetic reconstructions (n = 15) in the matched cohort (P = 0.99). The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic reconstructions in the unmatched (3 [6%] vs 29 [7%]; P = 0.99) and matched (2 [4%] vs 4 [9%]; P = 0.68) cohorts. On the multivariable analysis, operative time [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00–1.01; P = 0.006] and operative blood loss (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI, 1.00–1.00]; P = 0.012) were associated with higher rates of surgical site complications requiring reoperation; microvascular free flaps (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.00–0.42; P = 0.024) were associated with lower rates. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic prostheses in chest wall reconstructions.

Funder

National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is there an ‘ideal’ material for chest wall reconstruction?;European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;2023-11-28

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3