Aortic arch redo surgery: early and mid-term outcomes in 120 patients

Author:

Dietze Zara1ORCID,Kang Jagdip1ORCID,Madomegov Khadzhimurad1,Etz Christian D2ORCID,Misfeld Martin13456ORCID,Borger Michael A1ORCID,Leontyev Sergey1

Affiliation:

1. University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center , Leipzig, Germany

2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Hospital , Rostock, Germany

3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital , Sydney, NSW, Australia

4. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital , Sydney, NSW, Australia

6. The Baird Institute of Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research , Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyse the indications, surgical extent and results of treatment, as well as determine the risk factors for adverse outcomes after redo arch surgery. METHODS Between January 1996 and December 2022, 120 patients underwent aortic arch reoperations after primary proximal aortic surgery. We retrospectively analysed perioperative data, as well as early and mid-term outcomes in these patients. RESULTS Indications for arch reintervention included new aortic aneurysm in 34 patients (28.3%), expanding post-dissection aneurysm in 36 (30.0%), aortic graft infection in 39 (32.5%) and new aortic dissection in 9 cases. Two patients underwent reoperation due to iatrogenic complications. Thirty-one patients (25.8%) had concomitant endocarditis. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 11.7% and 15.0%, respectively. Stroke was observed in 11 (9.2%) and paraplegia in 1 patient. Prior surgery due to aneurysm [odds ratio 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–17.3] and critical preoperative state (odds ratio 5.9; 95% CI 1.5–23.7) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Overall 1- and 5-year survival was 65.8 ± 8.8% and 51.2 ± 10.6%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% CI 1.0–5.1) and peripheral arterial disease (hazard ratio 4.7; 95% CI 1.1–14.3) were independent predictors of late death. The cumulative incidence of reoperations was 12.6% (95% CI 6.7–20.4%) at 5 years. Accounting for mortality as a competing event, connective tissue disorders (subdistribution hazard ratio 4.5; 95% CI 1.6–15.7) and interval between primary and redo surgery (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06) were independent predictors of reoperations after redo arch surgery. CONCLUSIONS Despite being technically demanding, aortic arch reoperations are feasible and can be performed with acceptable results.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference23 articles.

1. Aortic re-operation after replacement of the proximal aorta: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Gaudino;Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2018

2. Editor's choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of vascular graft and endograft infections;Chakfé;Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2020

3. Correlation of cardiopulmonary bypass duration with acute renal failure after cardiac surgery;Axtell;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2020

4. Impact of cardiopulmonary bypass time on postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgeries: a systemic review and regression of metadata;Nadeem;Cureus,2019

5. Longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with greater numbers of cerebral microemboli;Brown;Stroke,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3