Phase III Randomized Trial of Bisphosphonates as Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: S0307

Author:

Gralow Julie R1ORCID,Barlow William E2ORCID,Paterson Alexander H G3,M'iao Jieling L2,Lew Danika L2,Stopeck Alison T4,Hayes Daniel F5ORCID,Hershman Dawn LORCID,Schubert Mark M6,Clemons Mark7ORCID,Van Poznak Catherine H,Dees Elizabeth C8,Ingle James N9ORCID,Falkson Carla I10,Elias Anthony D11,Messino Michael J12,Margolis Jeffrey H13,Dakhil Shaker R14,Chew Helen K15,Dammann Kim Z1,Abrams Jeffrey S16,Livingston Robert B17,Hortobagyi Gabriel N18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Washington, Seattle, WA

2. SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA

3. Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

4. Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University Cancer Center, Stony Brook, NY

5. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (DFH, CHVP); Columbia University, New York, NY

6. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

7. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

8. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

9. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

10. University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL

11. University of Colorado, Denver, CO

12. Cancer Care of WNC, Greenville, NC

13. Beaumont NCORP/William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI

14. Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS

15. University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA

16. Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

17. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

18. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Abstract

Abstract Background Adjuvant bisphosphonates, when given in a low-estrogen environment, can decrease breast cancer recurrence and death. Treatment guidelines include recommendations for adjuvant bisphosphonates in postmenopausal patients. SWOG/Alliance/Canadian Cancer Trials Group/ECOG-ACRIN/NRG Oncology study S0307 compared the efficacy of three bisphosphonates in early-stage breast cancer. Methods Patients with stage I–III breast cancer were randomly assigned to 3 years of intravenous zoledronic acid, oral clodronate, or oral ibandronate. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with overall survival as a secondary outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 6097 patients enrolled. Median age was 52.7 years. Prior to being randomly assigned, 73.2% patients indicated preference for oral vs intravenous formulation. DFS did not differ across arms in a log-rank test (P = .49); 5-year DFS was 88.3% (zoledronic acid: 95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.9% to 89.6%), 87.6% (clodronate: 95% CI = 86.1% to 88.9%), and 87.4% (ibandronate: 95% CI = 85.6% to 88.9%). Additionally, 5-year overall survival did not differ between arms (log rank P = .50) and was 92.6% (zoledronic acid: 95% CI = 91.4% to 93.6%), 92.4% (clodronate: 95% CI = 91.2% to 93.5%), and 92.9% (ibandronate: 95% CI = 91.5% to 94.1%). Bone as first site of recurrence did not differ between arms (P = .93). Analyses based on age and tumor subtypes showed no treatment differences. Grade 3/4 toxicity was 8.8% (zoledronic acid), 8.3% (clodronate), and 10.5% (ibandronate). Osteonecrosis of the jaw was highest for zoledronic acid (1.26%) compared with clodronate (0.36%) and ibandronate (0.77%). Conclusions We found no evidence of differences in efficacy by type of bisphosphonate, either in overall analysis or subgroups. Despite an increased rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw with zoledronic acid, overall toxicity grade differed little across arms. Given that patients expressed preference for oral formulation, efforts to make oral agents available in the United States should be considered.

Funder

National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

Berlex Pharmaceuticals

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc

Roche/Genentech

Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3