Abstract
Abstract
An essentialist theory of modality claims that the source of possibility and necessity lies in essence, where essence is (obviously) then not to be defined in terms of necessity. Hence such theories owe us an account of why it is that the essences of things give rise to necessities in the way required. A new approach to understanding essence in terms of the notion of generalized identity promises to answer this challenge by appeal to the necessity of identity. I explore the prospects for this approach, and argue that it fails. If one favours an account of essence in terms of generalized identity, then one will not, I argue, be able to satisfactorily defend an essentialist theory of modality against the challenge; if one wishes to defend an essentialist theory of modality, and thereby to give an explanation of how necessity arises from essence, one should not understand essence in terms of generalized identity.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference31 articles.
1. ‘The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order’;Barcan;Journal of Symbolic Logic,1947
2. Real Definitions’;Correia;Philosophical Issues: Metaphysics,2017
3. Grounding, Essence, and Identity’;Correia;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,2019
4. To Be F is to Be G’;Dorr;Philosophical Perspectives Metaphysics,2016
5. Two Kinds of Possibility’;Edgington;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume,2004
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献