A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults

Published:2023-10 Issue:Supplement_4 Volume:52 Page:iv67-iv81
ISSN:0002-0729
Container-title:Age and Ageing
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Oster Candice¹,Hines Sonia²,Rissel Chris²,Asante Dennis²,Khadka Jyoti¹,Seeher Katrin M³,Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan Jotheeswaran⁴,Mikton Christopher⁵,Diaz Theresa⁶,Isaac Vivian²⁷

Affiliation:

1. Flinders University Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, , Adelaide , Australia

2. Flinders University College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders Rural and Remote Health, , Alice Springs, Northern Territory , Australia

3. World Health Organization Brain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, , Geneva , Switzerland

4. World Health Organization Ageing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, , Geneva , Switzerland

5. World Health Organization Demographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Social Determinants of Health, , Geneva , Switzerland

6. World Health Organization Epidemiology, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, , Geneva , Switzerland

7. Charles Sturt University School of Allied Health, Exercise & Sports Sciences, Faculty of Science & Health, , Albury, New South Wales , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objective to examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over. Methods the databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software. Results the full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation. Conclusions this systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Link

https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-pdf/52/Supplement_4/iv67/52656790/afad100.pdf

Reference47 articles.

1. The UN decade of healthy ageing: strengthening measurement for monitoring health and wellbeing of older people;Thiyagarajan;Age Ageing,2022

2. The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing;Beard;BMJ Open,2019

3. Intrinsic capacity: validation of a new WHO concept for healthy aging in a longitudinal Chinese study;Beard;J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci,2022

4. A rapid review of the measurement of intrinsic capacity in older adults;George;J Nutr Health Aging,2021