Deprescribing to optimise health outcomes for frail older people: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial—outcomes of the Opti-med study

Author:

Etherton-Beer Christopher1,Page Amy1,Naganathan Vasi2,Potter Kathleen3,Comans Tracy4,Hilmer Sarah N2,McLachlan Andrew J2,Lindley Richard I2,Mangin Dee56

Affiliation:

1. WA Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia , M577, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley WA 6009 , Australia

2. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia

3. Operations, Ryman Healthcare , Christchurch, Canterbury , New Zealand

4. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia

5. Family Medicine, McMaster University . Hamilton, Canada

6. General Practice, University of Otago , Christchurch , New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract Background potentially harmful polypharmacy is very common in older people living in aged care facilities. To date, there have been no double-blind randomised controlled studies of deprescribing multiple medications. Methods three-arm (open intervention, blinded intervention and blinded control) randomised controlled trial enrolling people aged over 65 years (n = 303, noting pre-specified recruitment target of n = 954) living in residential aged care facilities. The blinded groups had medications targeted for deprescribing encapsulated while the medicines were deprescribed (blind intervention) or continued (blind control). A third open intervention arm had unblinded deprescribing of targeted medications. Results participants were 76% female with mean age 85.0 ± 7.5 years. Deprescribing was associated with a significant reduction in the total number of medicines used per participant over 12 months in both intervention groups (blind intervention group −2.7 medicines, 95% CI −3.5, −1.9, and open intervention group −2.3 medicines; 95% CI −3.1, −1.4) compared with the control group (−0.3, 95% CI −1.0, 0.4, P = 0.053). Deprescribing regular medicines was not associated with any significant increase in the number of ‘when required’ medicines administered. There were no significant differences in mortality in the blind intervention group (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.50, 1.73, P = 0.83) or the open intervention group (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.83, 2.61, P = 0.19) compared to the control group. Conclusions deprescribing of two to three medicines per person was achieved with protocol-based deprescribing during this study. Pre-specified recruitment targets were not met, so the impact of deprescribing on survival and other clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Polypharmacy among older Australians, 2006–2017: a population-based study;Page;Med J Aust,2019

2. A systematic review of the emerging definition of ‘deprescribing’ with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice;Reeve;British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology [Research Support, Non-US Gov't],2015

3. Adverse events after discontinuing medications in elderly outpatients;Graves;Arch Intern Med,1997

4. The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-palliative approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people;Garfinkel;Isr Med Assoc J,2007

5. Adverse events due to discontinuations in drug use and dose changes in patients transferred between acute and long-term care facilities;Boockvar;Arch Intern Med,2004

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3