Laboratory Workup of Lymphoma in Adults

Author:

Kroft Steven H1,Sever Cordelia E2,Bagg Adam3,Billman Brooke4,Diefenbach Catherine5,Dorfman David M6,Finn William G7,Gratzinger Dita A8,Gregg Patricia A9,Leonard John P10,Smith Sonali11,Souter Lesley12,Weiss Ronald L13,Ventura Christina B14,Cheung Matthew C15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, Froedtert Hospital and the Medical Colleges of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

2. Pathology Associates of Albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM

3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

4. Governance Services, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL

5. Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

6. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

7. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warde Medical Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI

8. Department of Pathology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA

9. Dept of Pathology, Lehigh Regional Medical Center, Lehigh Acres, FL

10. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

11. Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL

12. Consultant Methodologist, Wellandport, Canada

13. Department of Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT

14. Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL

15. Department of Medicine, Odette Cancer Centre/Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The diagnostic workup of lymphoma continues to evolve rapidly as experience and discovery lead to the addition of new clinicopathologic entities and techniques to differentiate them. The optimal clinically effective, efficient, and cost-effective approach to diagnosis that is safe for patients can be elusive, in both community-based and academic practice. Studies suggest that there is variation in practice in both settings. The aim of this review is to develop an evidence-based guideline for the preanalytic phase of testing, focusing on specimen requirements for the diagnostic evaluation of lymphoma. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the American Society of Hematology convened a panel of experts in the laboratory workup of lymphoma to develop evidence-based recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic review of the literature to address key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, recommendations were derived based on the available evidence, the strength of that evidence, and key judgments as defined in the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework. Results Thirteen guideline statements were established to optimize specimen selection, ancillary diagnostic testing, and appropriate follow-up for safe and accurate diagnosis of indolent and aggressive lymphoma. Conclusions Primary diagnosis and classification of lymphoma can be achieved with a variety of specimens. Application of the recommendations can guide decisions about specimen suitability, diagnostic capabilities, and correct utilization of ancillary testing. Disease prevalence in patient populations, availability of ancillary testing, and diagnostic goals should be incorporated into algorithms tailored to each practice environment.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3