Age-Related Differences in Mind Wandering: The Role of Emotional Valence

Author:

Welhaf Matthew S1ORCID,Banks Jonathan B2,Bugg Julie M1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis, Missouri , USA

2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Nova Southeastern University , Ft. Lauderdale, Florida , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Older adults consistently report fewer experiences of mind wandering compared to younger adults. Aging is also associated with a shift in the emotional focus of our thoughts, with older adults tending to experience an increase in attention toward positive information, or a “positivity bias,” relative to younger adults. Here, we tested if the positivity bias associated with aging can also predict age-related changes in the content of older adults’ mind wandering. Method Older adults and younger adults completed a go/no-go task with periodic thought probes to assess rates of emotionally valenced mind wandering. Results Older adults reported significantly less negatively and neutrally valenced mind wandering compared to younger adults, but there was no age difference in reports of positively valenced mind wandering. Overall rates of mind wandering predicted poorer task performance for both age groups: Individuals who mind wandered more, performed worse, but this did not differ by the emotional valence. Both older adults and younger adults showed similar in-the-moment performance deficits, with mind wandering reports being associated with worse immediate no-go accuracy and faster reaction times, consistent with mindless responding. Discussion Focusing on different dimensions of thought content, such as emotional valence, can provide new insight into age-related differences in mind wandering. Older adults’ mind wandering reports were less negative and neutral compared to younger adults’ reports suggesting a positivity bias for older adults. However, this positivity bias does not seem to affect task performance. We discuss the implications of the findings for mind wandering theories and the positivity bias.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference60 articles.

1. Are preferences in emotional processing affected by distraction? Examining the age-related positivity effect in visual fixation within a dual-task paradigm;Allard,2008

2. Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization;Allen;Wellcome open research,2019

3. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder;Anwyl-Irvine,2020

4. Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: The mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality;Banks,2022

5. Examining the role of emotional valence of mind wandering: All mind wandering is not equal;Banks,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3