Remdesivir for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Versus a Cohort Receiving Standard of Care

Author:

Olender Susan A1,Perez Katherine K2,Go Alan S3,Balani Bindu4,Price-Haywood Eboni G5,Shah Nirav S6,Wang Su7,Walunas Theresa L8,Swaminathan Shobha9,Slim Jihad10,Chin BumSik11,De Wit Stéphane12,Ali Shamim M1314,Soriano Viladomiu Alex15,Robinson Philip16,Gottlieb Robert L1718,Tsang Tak Yin Owen19,Lee I-Heng20,Hu Hao21,Haubrich Richard H20,Chokkalingam Anand P20,Lin Lanjia20,Zhong Lijie20,Bekele B Nebiyou20,Mera-Giler Robertino20,Phulpin Chloé22,Edgar Holly22,Gallant Joel20,Diaz-Cuervo Helena23,Smith Lindsey E20,Osinusi Anu O20,Brainard Diana M20,Bernardino Jose I24,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

2. Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA

3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA

4. Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA

5. Ochsner Health System and Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

6. NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

7. Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Medical Group, Livingston, New Jersey, USA

8. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

9. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

10. Prime Healthcare Services, St Michael’s LLC, Newark, New Jersey, USA

11. National Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

12. NEAT ID Foundation, CHU Saint Pierre, Brussels, Belgium

13. NEAT ID Foundation, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom

14. School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

15. Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

16. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, California, USA

17. Baylor University Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA

18. Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas, USA

19. Princess Margaret Hospital, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong

20. Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA

21. Gilead Sciences, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong

22. Gilead Sciences, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, United Kingdom

23. Gilead Sciences, Madrid, Spain

24. Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Abstract Background We compared the efficacy of the antiviral agent, remdesivir, versus standard-of-care treatment in adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using data from a phase 3 remdesivir trial and a retrospective cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 treated with standard of care. Methods GS-US-540–5773 is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing two courses of remdesivir (remdesivir-cohort). GS-US-540–5807 is an ongoing real-world, retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes in patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (non-remdesivir-cohort). Inclusion criteria were similar between studies: patients had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, were hospitalized, had oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, and had pulmonary infiltrates. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the treatment effect of remdesivir versus standard of care. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with recovery on day 14, dichotomized from a 7-point clinical status ordinal scale. A key secondary endpoint was mortality. Results After the inverse probability of treatment weighting procedure, 312 and 818 patients were counted in the remdesivir- and non-remdesivir-cohorts, respectively. At day 14, 74.4% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had recovered versus 59.0% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.03: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34–3.08, P < .001). At day 14, 7.6% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had died versus 12.5% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (aOR 0.38, 95% CI: .22–.68, P = .001). Conclusions In this comparative analysis, by day 14, remdesivir was associated with significantly greater recovery and 62% reduced odds of death versus standard-of-care treatment in patients with severe COVID-19. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04292899 and EUPAS34303.

Funder

Gilead Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3