The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons

Author:

Ortiz Daniel A1,Shukla Mayur R2,Loeffelholz Michael J1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

2. Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Abstract

AbstractWe reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question “What diagnostic considerations should be taken into account when screening for syphilis using the traditional or reverse algorithm?” Improved laboratory diagnosis of syphilis is an important element of the effort to reduce syphilis rates. Screening for syphilis is performed using either a nontreponemal or treponemal test (part of the traditional or reverse algorithm, respectively). Both syphilis algorithms are used by laboratories. However, there are limited data on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the algorithms. An expert panel generated “key questions” in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. This paper pertains to the key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the traditional or the reverse algorithm. A systematic literature review was performed, and tables of evidence were created to address this question.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

Reference46 articles.

1. Prevalence of traditional and reverse-algorithm syphilis screening in laboratory practice: a survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program;Rhoads;Arch Pathol Lab Med,2017

2. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening—four laboratories, New York City, 2005–2006;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2008

3. It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis;Loeffelholz;J Clin Microbiol,2012

4. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis—treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter?;Owusu-Edusei;Sex Transm Dis,2011

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States, 2024;MMWR. Recommendations and Reports;2024-02-08

2. Seroconversion in syphilis screening without positive confirmatory tests points at early infection;Sexually Transmitted Infections;2024-01-22

3. Perinatal Infections;Queenan's Management of High‐Risk Pregnancy;2023-12

4. Advantages and limitations of current diagnostic laboratory approaches in syphilis and congenital syphilis;Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy;2023-11-18

5. A ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm and the difficulties of confirming syphilis;Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology;2023-02-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3