Exploring Young Drivers’ Perceptions of Procedurally Just Policing

Author:

Bates Lyndel1ORCID,Anderson Levi1,McLean Rebecca2

Affiliation:

1. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

2. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract The procedural justice approach to policing may be an effective method of reducing young driver noncompliance with traffic laws. We undertook a qualitative study in two Australian states (Queensland and Victoria) to explore how procedural justice operates when police interact with young drivers. Metropolitan and regional focus groups were conducted (n = 31, 45% male, 17–25 years), and transcripts coded against the four procedural justice elements: (a) neutrality, (b) respect, (c) voice, and (d) trust. Young drivers did not perceive neutral treatment; they felt targeted due to their provisional licence plate, their gender (male), and vehicle type. Despite this, young drivers reported their interactions with police to be respectful, they were allowed to present their point of view (voice), and that police officers and agencies could be trusted. This has implications for how the procedural justice framework is conceptualized and operationalized, for it to be an effective tool for policing young drivers.

Funder

Australian Government

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law

Reference71 articles.

1. Young People, Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy in Nigeria;Akinlabi;Policing and Society,2017

2. What Drives Compliance? The Effect of Deterrence and Shame Emotions on Young Drivers’ Compliance with Road Laws;Allen;Policing and Society,2017

3. Understanding Street Racing and “Hoon” Culture: An Exploratory Investigation of Perceptions and Experiences;Armstrong;Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety,2006

4. Procedural Justice Policing and Citizen Compliance Behaviour: The Importance of Emotion;Barkworth;Psychology, Crime & Law,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3