Relative Vaccine Effectiveness of Cell- vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Against Test-Confirmed Influenza Over 3 Seasons Between 2017 and 2020 in the United States

Author:

Stein Alicia N1ORCID,Mills Carrie W2,McGovern Ian3ORCID,McDermott Kimberly W2,Dean Alex2,Bogdanov Alina N2,Sullivan Sheena G45,Haag Mendel D M6

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus , Melbourne , Australia

2. Real World Evidence, Veradigm , Chicago, Illinois , USA

3. Centre for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus , Waltham, Massachusetts , USA

4. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity , Melbourne , Australia

5. Department of Epidemiology, University of California , Los Angeles, California , USA

6. Centre for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus , Amsterdam , Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Influenza vaccine viruses grown in eggs may acquire egg-adaptive mutations that may reduce antigenic similarity between vaccine and circulating influenza viruses and decrease vaccine effectiveness. We compared cell- and egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVc and QIVe, respectively) for preventing test-confirmed influenza over 3 US influenza seasons (2017–2020). Methods Using a retrospective test-negative design, we estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc vs QIVe among individuals aged 4 to 64 years who had an acute respiratory or febrile illness and were tested for influenza in routine outpatient care. Exposure, outcome, and covariate data were obtained from electronic health records linked to pharmacy and medical claims. Season-specific rVE was estimated by comparing the odds of testing positive for influenza among QIVc vs QIVe recipients. Models were adjusted for age, sex, geographic region, influenza test date, and additional unbalanced covariates. A doubly robust approach was used combining inverse probability of treatment weights with multivariable regression. Results The study included 31 824, 33 388, and 34 398 patients in the 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020 seasons, respectively; ∼10% received QIVc and ∼90% received QIVe. QIVc demonstrated superior effectiveness vs QIVe in prevention of test-confirmed influenza: rVEs were 14.8% (95% CI, 7.0%–22.0%) in 2017–2018, 12.5% (95% CI, 4.7%–19.6%) in 2018–2019, and 10.0% (95% CI, 2.7%–16.7%) in 2019–2020. Conclusions This study demonstrated consistently superior effectiveness of QIVc vs QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza over 3 seasons characterized by different circulating viruses and degrees of egg adaptation.

Funder

CSL Seqirus

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3