Bayesian model-based outlier detection in network meta-analysis

Author:

Metelli Silvia1,Mavridis Dimitris2,Créquit Perrine13,Chaimani Anna1

Affiliation:

1. Inserm Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics, Université Paris Cité , Paris , France

2. Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina , Ioannina , Greece

3. Direction de la recherche Clinique , Hôpital Foch, Suresnes , France

Abstract

Abstract In network meta-analysis, some of the collected studies may deviate markedly from the others, for example, having very unusual effect sizes. These deviating studies can be regarded as outlying with respect to the rest of the network and can be influential on the pooled results. Thus, it could be inappropriate to synthesise those studies without further investigation. In this paper, we propose two Bayesian methods to detect outliers in a network meta-analysis via: (a) a mean-shifted outlier model and (b) posterior predictive p-values constructed from ad-hoc discrepancy measures. The former method uses Bayes factors to formally test each study against outliers while the latter provides a score of outlyingness for each study in the network, allowing to numerically quantify the uncertainty associated with being outlier. Furthermore, we present a simple method based on informative priors as part of the network meta-analysis model to down-weight the detected outliers. We conduct extensive simulations to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology while comparing it to some alternative outlier detection tools. Two case studies are then used to demonstrate our methods in practice.

Funder

Marie Skłodowska-Curie

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability

Reference38 articles.

1. A robust measure of skewness;Brys;Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,2004

2. Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: A systematic review and network meta-analysis;Créquit;BMC Medicine,2017

3. Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: The example of lung cancer;Créquit;BMC Medicine,2016

4. Network Meta-Analysis for Decision Making

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3