Long-Term Survivorship Care After Cancer Treatment - Summary of a 2017 National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop

Author:

Kline Ronald M1,Arora Neeraj K2,Bradley Cathy J3,Brauer Eden R4,Graves Darci L5,Lunsford Natasha Buchanan6,McCabe Mary S7,Nasso Shelley Fuld8,Nekhlyudov Larissa9,Rowland Julia H1011,Schear Rebekkah M1213,Ganz Patricia A413

Affiliation:

1. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD

2. Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research Program, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC

3. Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO

4. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

5. Office of Minority Health, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD

6. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

7. Independent Consultant in Survivorship and Medical Ethics, Arlington, VA

8. National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Silver Spring, MD

9. Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

10. Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

11. Smith Center for Healing and the Arts, Washington, DC

12. LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes at Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

13. Department of Health Policy & Management and Medicine, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Abstract The National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine sponsored a workshop on July 24 and 25, 2017 on Long-Term Survivorship after Cancer Treatment. The workshop brought together diverse stakeholders (patients, advocates, academicians, clinicians, research funders, and policymakers) to review progress and ongoing challenges since the Institute of Medicine (IOM)’s seminal report on the subject of adult cancer survivors published in 2006. This commentary profiles the content of the meeting sessions and concludes with recommendations that stem from the workshop discussions. Although there has been progress over the past decade, many of the recommendations from the 2006 report have not been fully implemented. Obstacles related to the routine delivery of standardized physical and psychosocial care services to cancer survivors are substantial, with important gaps in care for patients and caregivers. Innovative care models for cancer survivors have emerged, and changes in accreditation requirements such as the Commission on Cancer’s (CoC) requirement for survivorship care planning have put cancer survivorship on the radar. The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation’s Oncology Care Model (OCM), which requires psychosocial services and the creation of survivorship care plans for its beneficiary participants, has placed increased emphasis on this service. The OCM, in conjunction with the CoC requirement, is encouraging electronic health record vendors to incorporate survivorship care planning functionality into updated versions of their products. As new models of care emerge, coordination and communication among survivors and their clinicians will be required to implement patient- and community-centered strategies.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3