Scientific Arguments against Free Will

Author:

Tse Peter Ulric

Abstract

Abstract This chapter considers the Libet and Wegner experiments purporting to show that free will is an illusion. The chapter dismantles the Libet experiment and argues that he went far beyond his data in rejecting free will, and that he had an incomplete understanding of causation in the brain. The chapter also considers and disregards as irrelevant the Wegner experiments concerning the issue of free will. Finally, the chapter asks whether feelings of having willed or caused an action are about future or past actions. Some feelings of willing are retrodictive, about what one just caused, so cannot be causal of those actions. Other aspects of willing are prospective, such as conscious imagining and deliberation, and can be causal of subsequent thoughts and actions.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference304 articles.

1. Readiness potentials driven by non-motoric processes.;Consciousness & Cognition,2016

2. Ketogenic diets as an adjuvant cancer therapy: History and potential mechanism.;Redox Biology,2014

3. Early origin for human-like precision grasping: A comparative study of pollical distal phalanges in fossil hominins.;PLoS ONE,2010

4. Determined to conform: Disbelief in free will increases conformity.;Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2013

5. The impact of family structure on the health of children: Effects of divorce.;Linacre Quarterly,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3