Beyond mental well-being: A One Health perspective on biophobias

Author:

Mammola Stefano123ORCID,Nanni Veronica45,Martino Simone6,Correia Ricardo789,Eckert Ester M103,Norberg Melissa M11,Soga Masashi12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Molecular Ecology Group, Water Research Institute, National Research Council in Verbania ,

2. Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki , Helsinki ,

3. National Biodiversity Future Center , Palermo ,

4. Molecular Ecology Group, Water Research Institute , National Research Council, Verbania ,

5. School for Advanced Studies Science, Technology, and Society Department, , Pavia ,

6. James Hutton Institute , Aberdeen , Scotland

7. Biodiversity Unit of the University of Turku , Turku ,

8. Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science , Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki ,

9. Helsinki Institute for Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki , Helsinki ,

10. Molecular Ecology Group, Water Research Institute, National Research Council , Verbania ,

11. Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Macquarie University , Macquarie Park, New South Wales ,

12. Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo , Tokyo ,

Abstract

Abstract Aversive responses toward elements of the natural world, termed biophobias, are widespread. Whether they involve an irrational fear of animals, plants, germs, or dark forests, biophobias have far-reaching consequences that remain largely unstudied outside psychology and psychiatry. Foremost, biophobias affect mental health and entail direct (e.g., healthcare) and indirect (e.g., absenteeism from work) costs. In addition, they contribute to environmental and health issues through the overuse of pesticides and sanitizers, hinder sustainability efforts (e.g., insect phobia as a barrier to adopting insects in Western diets), and incur nonmaterial costs such as cultural erosion and avoidance of nature. Because these impacts emerge from complex interactions between human societies and ecosystems, we argue that biophobias are a quintessential One Health issue. One Health thinking could guide research and policy efforts to integrate medical, socioeconomic, and ecological perspectives in addressing biophobias. To advance a One Health agenda for biophobias, key knowledge gaps urgently need to be addressed.

Funder

RAC

Kone Foundation

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference86 articles.

1. Dimension and impact of biases in funding for species and habitat conservation;Adamo;Biological Conservation,2022

2. Fear assessment: Cost-benefit analysis and the pricing of fear and anxiety;Adler;Chicago-Kent Law Review,2004

3. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards;Aktar;Interdisciplinary Toxicology,2009

4. Costs of disorders of the brain in Europe;Andlin-Sobocki,2005

5. The German guidelines for the treatment of anxiety disorders: First revision;Bandelow;European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3