Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases

Author:

Kaufmann Timothy J1,Smits Marion2,Boxerman Jerrold3,Huang Raymond4,Barboriak Daniel P5,Weller Michael6ORCID,Chung Caroline7,Tsien Christina8,Brown Paul D9,Shankar Lalitha10,Galanis Evanthia11,Gerstner Elizabeth12,van den Bent Martin J13,Burns Terry C14,Parney Ian F14,Dunn Gavin15,Brastianos Priscilla K16,Lin Nancy U17,Wen Patrick Y18,Ellingson Benjamin M1920

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

4. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

6. Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

7. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

10. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA

11. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

12. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

13. Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands

14. Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

15. Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA

16. Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

17. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

18. Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

19. UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

20. Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract A recent meeting was held on March 22, 2019, among the FDA, clinical scientists, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocacy groups to discuss challenges and potential solutions for increasing development of therapeutics for central nervous system metastases. A key issue identified at this meeting was the need for consistent tumor measurement for reliable tumor response assessment, including the first step of standardized image acquisition with an MRI protocol that could be implemented in multicenter studies aimed at testing new therapeutics. This document builds upon previous consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) in high-grade gliomas and defines a protocol for brain metastases (BTIP-BM) that addresses unique challenges associated with assessment of CNS metastases. The “minimum standard” recommended pulse sequences include: (i) parameter matched pre- and post-contrast inversion recovery (IR)–prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (IR-GRE); (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquired after injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent and before post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images; (iii) axial 2D or 3D T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery; (iv) axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images; and (v) post-contrast 2D T1-weighted spin echo images for increased lesion conspicuity. Recommended sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5T and 3T MR systems. An “ideal” protocol is also provided, which replaces IR-GRE with 3D TSE T1-weighted imaging pre- and post-gadolinium, and is best performed at 3T, for which dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion is included. Recommended perfusion parameters are given.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Neurology (clinical),Oncology

Reference152 articles.

1. Recent trends in epidemiology of brain metastases: an overview;Tabouret;Anticancer Res.,2012

2. Metastatic brain cancer.;Wen,2001

3. Epidemiology and prognosis of brain metastases;Stelzer;Surg Neurol Int.,2013

4. Updates in the management of brain metastases;Arvold;Neuro Oncol.,2016

5. Toward determining the lifetime occurrence of metastatic brain tumors estimated from 2007 United States cancer incidence data;Davis;Neuro Oncol.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3