The rs6296 polymorphism in the 5-HT1b receptor in Dutch men with lifelong premature ejaculation: a genetic case-control association study

Abstract

Abstract Background Lifelong premature ejaculation (LPE) is a rare sexual condition believed to be caused by genetic neurobiological disorders. Aim In this study we sought to evaluate the genetic association between the rs6296 polymorphism of the 5-HT1b receptor and intravaginal ejaculation latency times (IELTs) in men with LPE compared with men in a control group. Methods This study was a prospective observational genetic case-control association study. The LPE definition of the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) 2013 was used. Patients were recruited in 2005-2009 while attending the department of Neurosexology, HagaZiekenhuis, the Netherlands. We obtained IELTs with the stopwatch method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for genotyping rs6296. A randomly selected group of European Caucasian men from the 1000GENOMES project was used as a control group. Outcomes Study outcomes included results of comparisons of analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests between genotypes and IELTs in study participants, genotypes of cases and controls determined with the chi-square test, and expressions of allelotype- and genotype-specific risks for LPE determined with odds ratios. Results In total, 67 men with LPE were included in this study. The geometric mean (SD) IELT was 32.0 (27.4) seconds and was non-normally distributed. Genotype frequencies consisted of 29 (43.3%) GG, 31 (46.3%) GC, and 7(10.4%) CC individuals in the LPE group. Log-transformed IELTs were not statistically significant (per ANOVA tests) in men with GG, GC, or CC genotypes (P = .54). Genotype frequencies consisted of 16 (6.6%) GG; 93 (38.8%) GC, and 131 (54.6%) CC individuals in the control group (n = 240). Significant differences were found when comparing allele (P = 1.02e-17) and genotype (P = 3.22e-16) frequencies in cases and controls using a chi-square test. A statistically significant increased risk for LPE was found for carriers of the G allele (OR 5.62; 95% CI 4.13-9.42). Statistically significant risks were also found for the CG genotype (OR 6.24; 95% CI 2.63-14.77) and the GG genotype (OR 33.92; 95% CI 12.79-89.93). Clinical implications By investigating polymorphisms in target genes the neuro-pathophysiology of LPE could be further elaborated, potentially leading to more effective treatment. Strengths and limitations This is to our knowledge the first study investigating rs6296 with regard to LPE. By using a strict definition for LPE (ISSM 2013) and using the stopwatch method for measuring IELTs, bias in selection of true LPE patients will be relatively low. This study is limited by a relatively small study population and the lack of IELT data in the control group. Conclusions This study shows a genetic association in rs6296 in men with LPE compared with healthy controls. This result warrants attempted replication in future studies.