Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization: international multicentre study

Author:

Bozkurt Emre12ORCID,Sijberden Jasper P134ORCID,Langella Serena5,Cipriani Federica6ORCID,Collado-Roura Francesc7,Morrison-Jones Victoria8,Görgec Burak34ORCID,Zozaya Gabriel9,Lanari Jacopo10,Aghayan Davit11ORCID,De Meyere Celine12,Fuks David13,Zimmiti Giuseppe1,Ielpo Benedetto14ORCID,Efanov Mikhail15ORCID,Sutcliffe Robert P16,Russolillo Nadia5ORCID,Gomez-Artacho Miquel7,Ratti Francesca6ORCID,D’Hondt Mathieu12,Edwin Bjørn11,Cillo Umberto10,Rotellar Fernando9,Besselink Marc G34ORCID,Primrose John N8,Lopez-Ben Santi7,Aldrighetti Luca A6ORCID,Ferrero Alessandro5,Abu Hilal Mohammad18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero , Brescia , Italy

2. Department of Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine , Istanbul , Turkey

3. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

4. Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

5. Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital , Turin , Italy

6. Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital , Milan , Italy

7. Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona , Girona , Spain

8. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton , UK

9. Department of Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA) , Pamplona , Spain

10. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital , Padua , Italy

11. The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway

12. Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital , Kortrijk , Belgium

13. Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes , Paris , France

14. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra , Barcelona , Spain

15. Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre , Moscow , Russia

16. Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic liver surgery is increasingly used for more challenging procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization. Methods This was an international retrospective multicentre study of patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent open or laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy after portal vein embolization between 2004 and 2020. The perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic and open approaches were compared using propensity score matching. Results Of 338 patients, 84 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure and 254 patients underwent an open procedure. Patients in the laparoscopic group less often underwent extended right hepatectomy (18% versus 34.6% (P = 0.004)), procedures in the setting of a two-stage hepatectomy (42% versus 65% (P < 0.001)), and major concurrent procedures (4% versus 16.1% (P = 0.003)). After propensity score matching, 78 patients remained in each group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operating and Pringle times (330 versus 258.5 min (P < 0.001) and 65 versus 30 min (P = 0.001) respectively) and a shorter length of stay (7 versus 8 days (P = 0.011)). The R0 resection rate was not different (71% for the laparoscopic approach versus 60% for the open approach (P = 0.230)). The median disease-free survival was 12 (95% c.i. 10 to 20) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 20 (95% c.i. 13 to 31) months for the open approach (P = 0.145). The median overall survival was 28 (95% c.i. 22 to 48) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 42 (95% c.i. 35 to 52) months for the open approach (P = 0.614). Conclusion The advantages of a laparoscopic over an open approach for (extended) right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization are limited.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3