Has the core outcome (domain) set for vitiligo been implemented? An updated systematic review on outcomes and outcome measures in vitiligo randomized clinical trials

Author:

Eleftheriadou Viktoria1,Bergqvist Christina2,Kechichian Elio3,Shourick Jason4,Ju Hyun-Jeong5,van Geel Nanja6,Bae Jung Min5,Ezzedine Khaled27

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, New Cross Hospital , The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton , UK

2. Department of Dermatology, Henri Mondor University Hospital , Créteil , France

3. Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University , Beirut , Lebanon

4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UMR 1027 INSERM, Toulouse University Hospital , Toulouse , France

5. Department of Dermatology, St Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul , Republic of Korea

6. Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium

7. EA 7379 EpidermE, Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil , UPEC, Créteil , France

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn 2015, a major achievement in vitiligo research was the development of an internationally agreed upon core outcome domain set for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Three outcomes were identified as being essential: repigmentation, side-effects/harms and maintenance of gained repigmentation. Four items were further recommended for inclusion. The following recommendations then followed: repigmentation should be assessed by measuring the percentage of repigmentation in quartiles (0–25%, 26–50%, 51–79%, 80–100%) and cosmetic acceptability of the results should be assessed using the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to assess uptake of the core outcome domain set for RCTs in vitiligo. Secondary objectives were to update the systematic review on outcomes reported in vitiligo RCTs, and to assess whether repigmentation and cosmetic acceptability of the results were measured using the above-mentioned recommended scales.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL and Systematic Reviews) and ClinicalTrials.gov for vitiligo RCTs between November 2009 and March 2021. Screening and data extraction were independently performed on title and summary by two researchers. All outcomes and outcome measures reported in eligible RCTs were retrieved and collated.ResultsIn total, 174 RCTs were identified: 62 were published between 2009 and 2015, and 112 were published between 2016 and 2021.Thirty-eight different outcomes were reported. Repigmentation was the primary outcome in 89% of trials (150 of 169). Forty-nine different tools were used to measure repigmentation. Side-effects and harms were reported in 78% of trials (136 of 174). Maintenance of gained repigmentation was reported in only 11% of trials (20 of 174) and duration of follow-up varied greatly from 1 to 14 months. Cosmetic acceptability of the results and cessation of disease activity were assessed in only 2% of trials (four of 174). Quality of life of patients with vitiligo was assessed in 13% of trials (22 of 174). Finally, only 11 of 112 RCTs (10%) published between 2016 and 2021 reported all three essential core outcome domains (repigmentation, side-effects and maintenance of gained repigmentation) and none of the trials reported both essential and recommended core outcome domains.ConclusionsEfforts are still needed to close the gap between set recommendations and RCT outcome reporting.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Dermatology

Reference170 articles.

1. Prevalence of vitiligo. Epidemiological survey on the Isle of Bornholm, Denmark;Howitz;Arch Dermatol,1977

2. Epidemiology of vitiligo in the French West Indies (Isle of Martinique);Boisseau-Garsaud;Int J Dermatol,2000

3. Psychological reaction to chronic skin disorders: a study of patients with vitiligo;Porter;Gen Hosp Psychiatry,1979

4. Response to cosmetic disfigurement: patients with vitiligo;Porter;Cutis,1987

5. Interventions for vitiligo;Ezzedine;JAMA,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3