Helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs. high flow nasal cannula oxygen in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Osman Adi1,Via Gabriele2,Sallehuddin Roslanuddin Mohd1,Ahmad Azma Haryaty1,Fei Sow Kai3,Azil Azlizawati1,Mojoli Francesco45,Fong Chan Pei1,Tavazzi Guido45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Resuscitation & Emergency Critical Care Unit, Trauma and Emergency Department, Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

2. Department of Anesthesia and intensive care, Cardiac Anesthesia & Intensive Care—Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland

3. Trauma and Emergency Department, Penang General Hospital, Jalan Residensi, George Town, Penang, Malaysia

4. Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, DEA Piano -1, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Viale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy

5. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Aims  Non-invasive ventilation represents an established treatment for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPO) although no data regarding the best ventilatory strategy are available. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of helmet CPAP (hCPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the early treatment of ACPO. Methods and results  Single-centre randomized controlled trial of patients admitted to the emergency department due to ACPO with hypoxemia and dyspnoea on face mask oxygen therapy. Patients were randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to receive hCPAP or HFNC and FiO2 set to achieve an arterial oxygen saturation >94%. The primary outcome was a reduction in respiratory rate; secondary outcomes included changes in heart rate, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Heart rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, and Respiratory rate (HACOR) score, Dyspnoea Scale, and intubation rate. Data were collected before hCPAP/HFNC placement and after 1 h of treatment. Amongst 188 patients randomized, hCPAP was more effective than HFNC in reducing respiratory rate [−12 (95% CI; 11–13) vs. −9 (95% CI; 8–10), P < 0.001] and was associated with greater heart rate reduction [−20 (95% CI; 17–23) vs. −15 (95% CI; 12–18), P = 0.042], P/F ratio improvement [+149 (95% CI; 135–163) vs. +120 (95% CI; 107–132), P = 0.003] as well as in HACOR scores [6 (0–12) vs. 4 (2–9), P < 0.001] and Dyspnoea Scale [4 (1–7) vs. 3.5 (1–6), P = 0.003]. No differences in intubation rate were noted (P = 0.321). Conclusion  Amongst patients with ACPO, hCPAP resulted in a greater short-term improvement in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters as compared with HFNC. Trial registration  Clinical trial submission: NMRR-17-1839-36966 (IIR). Registry name: Medical Research and Ethics Committee of Malaysia Ministry of Health. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04005092. URL registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04005092.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3