Affiliation:
1. University of Leeds , UK
2. Independent Conflict Analyst , India
3. German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Emerging research has suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic has generally favored rebel organizations—rather than states—in situations of intrastate conflict. This article challenges this perspective by analyzing the pandemic's impact on three dimensions of rebel activity—armed activity, popular support and recruitment, and rebel governance. It does so by using illustrative evidence from long-running insurgencies in Northeast India, characterized by long-term rebel weakness and minimal, if any, territorial control. The article finds that during the early, acute phase of the pandemic in 2020, state-imposed lockdowns, rebels’ own restrictions, and disruptions to supply chains constrained most dimensions of rebel activity. The easing of restrictions in 2021 revealed complex and multidimensional impacts on different armed groups, which often hinged on pre-existing positions such as armed group strength, strategy, relations with the state, and operational circumstances. These experiences of low-level insurgencies lacking territorial control add important qualifiers to the notion that rebels are inherently best placed to capitalize on stochastic shocks such as pandemics. Beyond the case of Northeast India, these findings make a number of contributions to the analysis of counterinsurgency and rebel governance.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Safety Research
Reference97 articles.
1. Joblessness, Perks of Surrender, ‘Frustration’: How ULFA-I Recruited over 40 Youth in 8 Months;Al Jazeera,2022
2. Not Whether, but When? Governments’ Use of Militias in War;Ambrozik;Security Studies,2019
3. COVID-19 and Its Impact on the Indian Economy;Barbate;Vision,2021
4. Durable Disorder
5. Winning by Process
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献