Development and Validation of a Novel Food-Based Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)

Author:

Bromage Sabri1,Batis Carolina2,Bhupathiraju Shilpa N13,Fawzi Wafaie W1,Fung Teresa T14ORCID,Li Yanping1ORCID,Deitchler Megan5,Angulo Erick2,Birk Nick1,Castellanos-Gutiérrez Analí2,He Yuna6,Fang Yuehui6,Matsuzaki Mika7ORCID,Zhang Yiwen1,Moursi Mourad5,Gicevic Selma18,Holmes Michelle D13,Isanaka Sheila1ORCID,Kinra Sanjay9,Sachs Sonia E10,Stampfer Meir J13,Stern Dalia2,Willett Walter C13

Affiliation:

1. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

2. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico

3. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

4. Department of Nutrition, Simmons University, Boston, MA, USA

5. Intake - Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI Solutions, Washington, DC, USA

6. National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China

7. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

8. London Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health, London, United Kingdom

9. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Disease, London, United Kingdom

10. Center for Sustainable Development, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Poor diet quality is a major driver of both classical malnutrition and noncommunicable disease (NCD) and was responsible for 22% of adult deaths in 2017. Most countries face dual burdens of undernutrition and NCDs, yet no simple global standard metric exists for monitoring diet quality in populations and population subgroups. Objectives We aimed to develop an easy-to-use metric for nutrient adequacy and diet related NCD risk in diverse settings. Methods Using cross-sectional and cohort data from nonpregnant, nonlactating women of reproductive age in 10 African countries as well as China, India, Mexico, and the United States, we undertook secondary analyses to develop novel metrics of diet quality and to evaluate associations between metrics and nutrient intakes and adequacy, anthropometry, biomarkers, type 2 diabetes, and iteratively modified metric design to improve performance and to compare novel metric performance to that of existing metrics. Results We developed the Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS), a food-based metric incorporating a more comprehensive list of food groups than most existing diet metrics, and a simple means of scoring consumed amounts. In secondary analyses, the GDQS performed comparably with the Minimum Dietary Diversity - Women indicator in predicting an energy-adjusted aggregate measure of dietary protein, fiber, calcium, iron, zinc, vitamin A, folate, and vitamin B12 adequacy and with anthropometric and biochemical indicators of undernutrition (including underweight, anemia, and serum folate deficiency), and the GDQS also performed comparably or better than the Alternative Healthy Eating Index - 2010 in capturing NCD-related outcomes (including metabolic syndrome, change in weight and waist circumference, and incident type 2 diabetes). Conclusions The simplicity of the GDQS and its ability to capture both nutrient adequacy and diet-related NCD risk render it a promising candidate for global monitoring platforms. Research is warranted to validate methods to operationalize GDQS assessment in population surveys, including a novel application–based 24-h recall system developed as part of this project.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Intake – Center for Dietary Assessment

National Institutes of Health

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference58 articles.

1. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017;GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators;Lancet North Am Ed,2019

2. Defining diet quality: a synthesis of dietary quality metrics and their validity for the double burden of malnutrition;Miller;Lancet Planetary Health,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3