Pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection: retrospective multicentre study

Author:

Zhong Hao1,Cai Zhenghao1,Lu Junyang2,Yang Yingchi3,Xu Qing4,Wang Nan5,He Liang6,Hu Xiyue7,Fingerhut Abraham8,Zheng Minhua1,Lu Aiguo1,Liu Zheng7,Xiao Yi2ORCID,Feng Bo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine , Shanghai , China

2. Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Beijing , China

3. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China

4. Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine , Shanghai , China

5. Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital , Shanxi , China

6. Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin , China

7. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences , Beijing , China

8. Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz , Graz , Austria

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection. Methods In this retrospective study, patients from seven institutions in China who underwent laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer between 2019 and 2021 were selected and included. Either extended right hemicolectomy or transverse colectomy/extended left hemicolectomy was performed. The clinical characteristics and the pathological and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing extracorporeal or intracorporeal anastomosis. Resection margin lengths were measured on formalin-fixed specimens and an inadequate margin was defined as less than 4.2 cm between the division and the tumour. The outcome of interest was the prevalence of specimens with an inadequate margin. Length of incision, bowel function recovery, hospital stay, early postoperative pain (first day after surgery), 30-day complications, and nodal harvest were investigated as secondary outcomes. Results Of 411 patients treated during the study interval, 370 patients with transverse colon cancer were included (23.2 per cent treated with intracorporeal anastomosis and 76.8 per cent treated with extracorporeal anastomosis). The prevalence of specimens with inadequate margins was lower in the intracorporeal anastomosis group compared with the extracorporeal anastomosis group in patients undergoing extended right hemicolectomy (P = 0.045) and in patients undergoing transverse colectomy/extended left hemicolectomy (P = 0.030). In multivariate analysis, extracorporeal anastomosis (OR 2.94 (95 per cent c.i. 1.33 to 6.49), P = 0.008) and transverse colectomy/extended left hemicolectomy (OR 1.75 (95 per cent c.i. 1.03 to 2.96), P = 0.038) were independent risk factors for specimens with an inadequate margin. Intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with a shorter incision length (P < 0.001), an earlier recovery of bowel function (P = 0.035), a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.042), less early postoperative pain (P < 0.001), a longer specimen length (P = 0.042), a longer resection margin (P = 0.007), and a greater lymph node harvest (P = 0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day complications. Conclusion Patients with transverse colon cancer have better perioperative outcomes, fewer margins of less than 4.2 cm, and larger lymph node harvests when the anastomosis is performed intracorporeally. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Registration number NCT05061199 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Funder

Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Centre for Translational Medicine

National Facility for Translational Medicine

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3