Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis

Author:

Marconi Nicola1ORCID,Allen Christopher Patrick2ORCID,Bhattacharya Siladitya3,Maheshwari Abha3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

2. Aberdeen Fertility Centre National Health Service Grampian, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

3. School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Extended embryo culture to blastocyst stage is widely used in IVF and is the default strategy in most clinics. The last decade has witnessed a growing interest in obstetric–perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer. Recent studies have challenged the conclusions of systematic reviews that associate risks of preterm birth (PTB) and large for gestational age (LGA) babies with blastocyst transfer. A higher proportion of blastocysts is transferred as frozen-thawed embryos, which may also have added implications. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to conduct an updated systematic review of the obstetric–perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies following blastocyst-stage transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles. Where deemed appropriate, data were combined in cumulative meta-analyses. SEARCH METHODS Data sources from Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (1980–2020) were searched using combinations of relevant keywords. Searches had no language restrictions and were limited to human studies. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing obstetric–perinatal outcomes between singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage transfer and those after cleavage-stage transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles were sought. Two independent reviewers extracted data in 2 × 2 tables and assessed the methodological quality of the relevant studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme scoring. Cumulative meta-analyses were carried out with independent analysis of pregnancies after fresh and frozen embryo transfers, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. If provided by included studies, adjusted effect sizes were combined in a sensitivity analysis. OUTCOMES A total of 35 studies were included (n = 520 769 singleton pregnancies). Outcome data suggest singleton pregnancies following fresh blastocyst transfer were associated with higher risk of LGA (risk ratio (RR) 1.14; 95% CI 1.05–1.24) and very PTB (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08–1.26) compared to fresh cleavage-stage transfer. Singleton pregnancies following frozen blastocyst transfer were associated with higher risks of LGA (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08–1.27), PTB (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03–1.24) and caesarean section (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03–1.13) but lower risks of small for gestational age (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95) and perinatal mortality (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58–0.86). Increased risks of LGA and PTB after frozen blastocyst transfer persisted in the sensitivity analysis, which also showed a significantly increased risk of PTB after fresh blastocyst transfer. Cumulative meta-analyses revealed consistency in prevalence and magnitude of risks for a number of years. Data on other perinatal outcomes are still evolving. WIDER IMPLICATIONS While the available evidence is predominantly reassuring in the context of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, observational data suggest that blastocyst transfer is associated with a higher risk of LGA. This holds true irrespective of fresh or frozen transfer. Meta-analysis of adjusted data showed an increased risk of PTB with fresh and frozen blastocyst transfer. However, the quality of available evidence ranges from low to very low. Although blastocyst-stage embryo transfer remains the default position in most centres, based on individual risk profile we may need to consider cleavage-stage embryo transfer in some to mitigate the risk of LGA/PTB.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3