Elimination and penetration of amikacin into urine in patients with decreased glomerular filtration rate

Author:

Hartinger Jan Miroslav1,Dvořáčková Eliška1,Krátký Vojtěch2,Hrušková Zdenka2,Mysliveček Marek2,Bobek Daniel1,Benáková Hana3,Závora Jan3,Kroneislová Gabriela3,Halouzková Barbora Agatha1,Brejníková Martina4,Martínková Vendula4,Tesař Vladimír2,Slanař Ondřej1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague , Prague , Czech Republic

2. Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague , Prague , Czech Republic

3. Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague , Prague , Czech Republic

4. 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital , Prague , Czech Republic

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Amikacin monotherapy is recommended for urinary tract infection (UTI) treatment with multi-resistant pathogens. Even though amikacin efficacy in the treatment of UTIs is dependent on its urinary concentration, there are no robust data proving that sufficiently high urinary concentration is reached in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Methods A prospective study to monitor amikacin penetration into urine of 70 patients [40 males, median (interquartile range) age 70 (65–79) years] with different levels of glomerular filtration decline, including patients treated by dialysis, was conducted. The bactericidal efficacy of amikacin in urine samples has been evaluated. Results Patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) <30 mL/min had significantly lower median amikacin urinary concentration than patients with eGFR >30 mL/min (89.75 vs 186.0 mg/L, P < .0001; 200.5 vs 830.0 mg/L, P < .0001; and 126.0 vs 408.0 mg/L, P < .0001 for minimal, maximal and minimal together with maximal concentrations, respectively). The amount of amikacin eliminated in the first 10–13 h after dose administration was dependent on eGFR (r2 = 0.6144, P < .0001). The urinary concentration of amikacin in patients treated by dialysis was indirectly proportional to pH of urine. The plasma concentrations of amikacin did not correlate with urinary levels in patients in either of the GFR categories. Microbiological evaluation showed that the critical urinary concentration for efficacy of amikacin during UTI monotherapy in patients treated by dialysis is 100 mg/L. We found that 4 out of 11 patients treated by dialysis did not reach this level during the treatment. Conclusion Systemic administration of amikacin monotherapy in patients treated by dialysis is questionable as the concentrations of amikacin in their urine are often below the threshold of effectivity. Amikacin plasma concentrations are not a major determinant of amikacin concentration in urine, therefore pulse dosing is neither necessary nor safe in patients treated by dialysis, and may cause undesirable toxicity.

Funder

Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3