A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of male infertility genes

Author:

Oud Manon S1ORCID,Volozonoka Ludmila23,Smits Roos M4,Vissers Lisenka E L M1,Ramos Liliana4,Veltman Joris A12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

2. Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom

3. Scientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Which genes are confidently linked to human monogenic male infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER Our systematic literature search and clinical validity assessment reveals that a total of 78 genes are currently confidently linked to 92 human male infertility phenotypes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The discovery of novel male infertility genes is rapidly accelerating with the availability of next-generating sequencing methods, but the quality of evidence for gene–disease relationships varies greatly. In order to improve genetic research, diagnostics and counseling, there is a need for an evidence-based overview of the currently known genes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed a systematic literature search and evidence assessment for all publications in Pubmed until December 2018 covering genetic causes of male infertility and/or defective male genitourinary development. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Two independent reviewers conducted the literature search and included papers on the monogenic causes of human male infertility and excluded papers on genetic association or risk factors, karyotype anomalies and/or copy number variations affecting multiple genes. Next, the quality and the extent of all evidence supporting selected genes was weighed by a standardized scoring method and used to determine the clinical validity of each gene–disease relationship as expressed by the following six categories: no evidence, limited, moderate, strong, definitive or unable to classify. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE From a total of 23 526 records, we included 1337 publications about monogenic causes of male infertility leading to a list of 521 gene–disease relationships. The clinical validity of these gene–disease relationships varied widely and ranged from definitive (n = 38) to strong (n = 22), moderate (n = 32), limited (n = 93) or no evidence (n = 160). A total of 176 gene–disease relationships could not be classified because our scoring method was not suitable. LARGE SCALE DATA Not applicable. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our literature search was limited to Pubmed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The comprehensive overview will aid researchers and clinicians in the field to establish gene lists for diagnostic screening using validated gene–disease criteria and help to identify gaps in our knowledge of male infertility. For future studies, the authors discuss the relevant and important international guidelines regarding research related to gene discovery and provide specific recommendations for the field of male infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by a VICI grant from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (918-15-667 to J.A.V.), the Royal Society, and Wolfson Foundation (WM160091 to J.A.V.) as well as an investigator award in science from the Wellcome Trust (209451 to J.A.V.). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER None.

Funder

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

Royal Society and Wolfson Foundation

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Reference50 articles.

1. Is there a robust future for research in reproduction?;Barratt;Mol Hum Reprod,2016

2. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities;Barratt;Hum Reprod Update,2017

3. Genotypes and phenotypes in cystic fibrosis and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator-related disorders;Bombieri;Semin Respir Crit Care Med,2015

4. The human RHOX gene cluster: target genes and functional analysis of gene variants in infertile men;Borgmann;Hum Mol Genet,2016

5. Genetics of the human Y chromosome and its association with male infertility;Colaco;Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3