The efficacy of systemic glucocorticosteroids for pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Author:

McWilliams Daniel F1ORCID,Thankaraj Divya1,Jones-Diette Julie1,Morgan Rheinallt2,Ifesemen Onosi S1,Shenker Nicholas G3ORCID,Walsh David A14

Affiliation:

1. Division of ROD, Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, UK

2. Elective Orthopaedics Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

3. Department of Rheumatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

4. Department of Rheumatology, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-in-Ashfield, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are recommended to suppress inflammation in people with active RA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the effects of systemic GCs on RA pain. Methods A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in RA comparing systemic GCs to inactive treatment. Three databases were and spontaneous pain and evoked pain outcomes were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences were meta-analysed. Heterogeneity (I2, tau statistics) and bias (funnel plot, Egger’s test) were assessed. Subgroup analyses investigated sources of variation. This study was pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42019111562). Results A total of 18 903 titles, 880 abstracts and 226 full texts were assessed. Thirty-three RCTs suitable for the meta-analysis included 3123 participants. Pain scores (spontaneous pain) decreased in participants treated with oral GCs; SMD = −0.65 (15 studies, 95% CI −0.82, −0.49, P <0.001) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 56%, P =0.0002). Efficacy displayed time-related decreases after GC initiation. Mean difference visual analogue scale pain was −15 mm (95% CI −20, −9) greater improvement in GC than control at ≤3 months, −8 mm (95% CI −12, −3) at >3–6 months and −7 mm (95% CI −13, 0) at >6 months. Similar findings were obtained when evoked pain outcomes were examined. Data from five RCTs suggested improvement also in fatigue during GC treatment. Conclusion Oral GCs are analgesic in RA. The benefit is greatest shortly after initiation and GCs might not achieve clinically important pain relief beyond 3 months. Treatments other than anti-inflammatory GCs should be considered to reduce the long-term burden of pain in RA.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

Reference99 articles.

1. Patient perceptions concerning pain management in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis;Taylor;J Int Med Res,2010

2. Effects of glucocorticoids on radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis;Kirwan;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2007

3. The origins, results and consequences of the 1995 Arthritis Research Campaign Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Study;Kirwan;Clin Exp Rheumatol,2011

4. Short-term low-dose corticosteroids vs placebo and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis;Gøtzsche;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2005

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3