Recommendations for patient similarity classes: results of the AMIA 2019 workshop on defining patient similarity

Author:

Seligson Nathan D12ORCID,Warner Jeremy L3ORCID,Dalton William S45,Martin David6ORCID,Miller Robert S7ORCID,Patt Debra8ORCID,Kehl Kenneth L910,Palchuk Matvey B1011ORCID,Alterovitz Gil1012,Wiley Laura K13ORCID,Huang Ming14ORCID,Shen Feichen14,Wang Yanshan14ORCID,Nguyen Khoa A15,Wong Anthony F16,Meric-Bernstam Funda17ORCID,Bernstam Elmer V18,Chen James L19

Affiliation:

1. University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

2. Nemours Children's Specialty Care, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

3. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

4. M2Gen, Tampa, Florida, USA

5. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA

6. United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

7. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia, USA

8. Texas Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA

9. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

10. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

11. TriNetX, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

12. Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

13. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA

14. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

15. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

16. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

17. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

18. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas, USA

19. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Abstract

Abstract Defining patient-to-patient similarity is essential for the development of precision medicine in clinical care and research. Conceptually, the identification of similar patient cohorts appears straightforward; however, universally accepted definitions remain elusive. Simultaneously, an explosion of vendors and published algorithms have emerged and all provide varied levels of functionality in identifying patient similarity categories. To provide clarity and a common framework for patient similarity, a workshop at the American Medical Informatics Association 2019 Annual Meeting was convened. This workshop included invited discussants from academics, the biotechnology industry, the FDA, and private practice oncology groups. Drawing from a broad range of backgrounds, workshop participants were able to coalesce around 4 major patient similarity classes: (1) feature, (2) outcome, (3) exposure, and (4) mixed-class. This perspective expands into these 4 subtypes more critically and offers the medical informatics community a means of communicating their work on this important topic.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference40 articles.

1. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them;Pallmann;BMC Med,2018

2. Patient similarity in prediction models based on health data: a scoping review;Sharafoddini;JMIR Med Inform,2017

3. Prediction of heart failure decompensation events by trend analysis of telemonitoring data;Henriques;IEEE J Biomed Health Inform,2015

4. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996;Sackett;Clin Orthop Relat Res,2007

5. Patient similarity networks for precision medicine;Pai;J Mol Biol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3