Potential bias and lack of generalizability in electronic health record data: reflections on health equity from the National Institutes of Health Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory

Author:

Boyd Andrew D12,Gonzalez-Guarda Rosa3,Lawrence Katharine4ORCID,Patil Crystal L52,Ezenwa Miriam O67,O’Brien Emily C8ORCID,Paek Hyung9,Braciszewski Jordan M10,Adeyemi Oluwaseun11,Cuthel Allison M11ORCID,Darby Juanita E52ORCID,Zigler Christina K12,Ho P Michael13,Faurot Keturah R1415,Staman Karen L12,Leigh Jonathan W52,Dailey Dana L1617,Cheville Andrea18,Del Fiol Guilherme1920ORCID,Knisely Mitchell R3,Grudzen Corita R21,Marsolo Keith8,Richesson Rachel L22,Schlaeger Judith M52

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago , Chicago,

2. Illinois, USA , Chicago,

3. Duke University School of Nursing , Durham, North Carolina, USA

4. Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine , New York City, New York, USA

5. College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago , Chicago,

6. University of Florida College of Nursing , Gainesville,

7. Florida, USA , Gainesville,

8. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, North Carolina, USA

9. Biostatistics (Health Informatics), Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut, USA

10. Henry Ford Health , Detroit, Michigan

11. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine , New York City, New York, USA

12. Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, North Carolina, USA

13. Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado, USA

14. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill,

15. North Carolina, USA , Chapel Hill,

16. Physical Therapy, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa, USA

17. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Department, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa, USA

18. Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center , Rochester, Minnesota, USA

19. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City,

20. Utah, USA , Salt Lake City,

21. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York City, New York, USA

22. Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Abstract

Abstract Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) play a vital role in addressing current population health problems, and their use of electronic health record (EHR) systems promises efficiencies that will increase the speed and volume of relevant and generalizable research. However, as the number of ePCTs using EHR-derived data grows, so does the risk that research will become more vulnerable to biases due to differences in data capture and access to care for different subsets of the population, thereby propagating inequities in health and the healthcare system. We identify 3 challenges—incomplete and variable capture of data on social determinants of health, lack of representation of vulnerable populations that do not access or receive treatment, and data loss due to variable use of technology—that exacerbate bias when working with EHR data and offer recommendations and examples of ways to actively mitigate bias.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Cancer Institute

National Institute on Aging

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institute of Nursing Research

National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research

Office of Disease Prevention

NIH

Institutes, Centers, and Offices: EMBED

PRIM-ER

Institutes, Centers, and Offices: BackInAction

BeatPain Utah

FM-TIPS

GRACE

NOHARM

OPTIMUM

NCCIH

NIAID

NCI

NIA

NHLBI

NINR

NIMHD

NIAMS

OBSSR

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3