Closing the gap: prognostic and predictive biomarker validation for personalized care in a Latin American hormone-dependent breast cancer cohort

Author:

Alves da Quinta Daniela12,Rocha Darío3,Retamales Javier4,Giunta Diego5,Artagaveytia Nora6,Velazquez Carlos7,Daneri-Navarro Adrian8,Müller Bettina9,Abdelhay Eliana10,Bravo Alicia I11,Castro Mónica12,Rosales Cristina13,Alcoba Elsa13,Acosta Haab Gabriela13,Carrizo Fernando11,Sorin Irene10,Di Sibio Alejandro14,Marques-Silveira Márcia15,Binato Renata10,Caserta Benedicta16,Greif Gonzalo17,Del Toro-Arreola Alicia8,Quintero-Ramos Antonio8,Gómez Jorge18,Podhajcer Osvaldo L1,Fernández Elmer A192021, ,Llera Andrea S1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratorio de Terapia Molecular y Celular, Fundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET , Ciudad de Buenos Aires , Argentina

2. Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE), Instituto de Tecnología (INTEC) , Buenos Aires , Argentina

3. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales , Córdoba , Argentina

4. Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo Chileno de Investigación , Santiago de Chile , Chile

5. Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires-CONICET , Buenos Aires , Argentina

6. Hospital de Clínicas Manuel Quintela, Universidad de la República , Montevideo , Uruguay

7. Universidad de Sonora , Hermosillo , Mexico

8. Universidad de Guadalajara , Guadalajara , Mexico

9. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer , Santiago de Chile , Chile

10. Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Instituto Nacional de Câncer , Rio de Janeiro, RJ , Brazil

11. Hospital Regional de Agudos Eva Perón , San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires , Argentina

12. Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo , Ciudad de Buenos Aires , Argentina

13. Hospital Municipal de Oncología María Curie , Ciudad de Buenos Aires , Argentina

14. Hospital General de Agudos “Dr.Cosme Argerich” , Buenos Aires , Argentina

15. Molecular Oncology Research Center, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos , Barretos , Brazil

16. Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell , Montevideo , Uruguay

17. Institut Pasteur de Montevideo , Montevideo , Uruguay

18. Health Sciences Center, Texas A&M University , Bryan, TX 77807, United States

19. Fundación para el Progreso de la Medicina, Laboratorio de Investigación en Cáncer , Córdoba , Argentina

20. CONICET , Córdoba, Argentina

21. FCEFyN, Depto. de Computación, Escuela de Ingeniería Biomédica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba , Córdoba , Argentina

Abstract

Abstract Background Several guidelines recommend the use of different classifiers to determine the risk of recurrence (ROR) and treatment decisions in patients with HR+HER2− breast cancer. However, data are still lacking for their usefulness in Latin American (LA) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative prognostic and predictive performance of different ROR classifiers in a real-world LA cohort. Methods The Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) is an LA case-cohort study with 5-year follow-up. Stages I and II, clinically node-negative HR+HER2− patients (n = 340) who received adjuvant hormone therapy and/or chemotherapy, were analyzed. Time-dependent receiver-operator characteristic-area under the curve, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (CPHR) models were used to compare the prognostic performance of several risk biomarkers. Multivariate CPHR with interaction models tested the predictive ability of selected risk classifiers. Results Within this cohort, transcriptomic-based classifiers such as the recurrence score (RS), EndoPredict (EP risk and EPClin), and PAM50-risk of recurrence scores (ROR-S and ROR-PC) presented better prognostic performances for node-negative patients (univariate C-index 0.61-0.68, adjusted C-index 0.77-0.80, adjusted hazard ratios [HR] between high and low risk: 4.06-9.97) than the traditional classifiers Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index (univariate C-index 0.53-0.59, adjusted C-index 0.72-0.75, and adjusted HR 1.85-2.54). RS (and to some extent, EndoPredict) also showed predictive capacity for chemotherapy benefit in node-negative patients (interaction P = .0200 and .0510, respectively). Conclusion In summary, we could prove the clinical validity of most transcriptomic-based risk classifiers and their superiority over clinical and immunohistochemical-based methods in the heterogenous, real-world node-negative HR+HER2− MPBCS cohort.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

CONICET

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3